Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:20 pmGo get Flamini...
Bad Bob wrote:Go get Flamini...
Heard he has some attitude problems.
Liverpool FC Forum
Liverpool Football Club Discussion
https://www.liverpoolfc-newkit.co.uk/
Luke young
https://www.liverpoolfc-newkit.co.uk/the-rumour-mill/luke-young-t28270-225.html
Page 16 of 17
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:20 pmPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:21 pmHeard he has some attitude problems.
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:17 pmSkysports.com understands Fulham are leading the race to sign Aston Villa defender Luke Young.
Liverpool appeared to be favourites to land the versatile defender after agreeing a deal with Villa, but it understood the move has collapsed as the player does not want to move his family north.
The former Tottenham and Charlton man is believed to be holding out for a move back to the capital as he seeks a switch away from Villa.
Villa are ready to offload Young after he dropped well down the pecking order in Martin O'Neill's plans.
A number of clubs including Sunderland and Fulham are believed to have expressed an interest in the 31-year-old, but Fulham are favourites for his signature.
Fulham have held a long-term interest in Young and incoming boss Mark Hughes is believed to be ready to push through a deal for the former England international as he looks to bolster the squad at Craven Cottage.
Liverpool appeared to be favourites to land the versatile defender after agreeing a deal with Villa, but it understood the move has collapsed as the player does not want to move his family north.
The former Tottenham and Charlton man is believed to be holding out for a move back to the capital as he seeks a switch away from Villa.
Villa are ready to offload Young after he dropped well down the pecking order in Martin O'Neill's plans.
A number of clubs including Sunderland and Fulham are believed to have expressed an interest in the 31-year-old, but Fulham are favourites for his signature.
Fulham have held a long-term interest in Young and incoming boss Mark Hughes is believed to be ready to push through a deal for the former England international as he looks to bolster the squad at Craven Cottage.
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:59 pmeuropian-kings wrote:NANNY RED wrote:I really cant believe this im stunned,, Luke Young ffs. second choice at Villa, hes a right back ,what the feckin problem is wrong with Kelly and Derby, 2.5 MILLION for a 31 year old second rate defender, in a position that we have more than ample cover for, we need a top class left back and were wasting money which we dont have on a player like young
Im absolutly stunned by this
haha you won't like my comment above then Nanny
I better go hide
Also trying for Wayne Bridge. Jeez is that the best he can do! hes is feckin' USELESS, always was, and always will be. Man city reject - no thanks, we wanna be above them this year, not below 'em. so No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No, not worthy of the shirt
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:18 pmLuke Young's proposed transfer to Liverpool collapsed today, leaving the full-back facing an uncertain future at Aston Villa. Liverpool had agreed a £2.5m fee with Villa on Tuesday for the former England international but there were suggestions that Young was unable to agree personal terms at Anfield as well as being reluctant to relocate to the north.
The news will come as a disappointment to Liverpool and Villa. Roy Hodgson, the Liverpool manager, was keen to bring in the experienced defender to improve his options at full-back and also increase his quota of home-grown players, while Villa were eager to move on one of their higher earners as they look to reduce their £70m annual wage bill. Young was earning more than £2m a year at Villa and has three years remaining on his contract, with further signing-on fees due over the course of that period.
Liverpool had initially indicated Young would have to lower his demands, which have deterred interest from other clubs this summer, although when Martin O'Neill, the Villa manager, reported earlier in the week that a bid had been accepted it began to look like a deal might go through. That is no longer the case, leaving Young to continue his pre-season training in Portugal with Villa and O'Neill cursing a missed opportunity to free up some money.
The Villa manager has been told he will have to operate within the constraints of a "sell-to-buy" policy this summer, accentuating the need to move on a number of players on the periphery. At the moment, however, Steve Sidwell, Nigel-Reo-Coker, Habib Beye, Curtis Davies, Nicky Shorey and Young all remain Villa players. There has also been no progress with James Milner's situation despite ongoing negotiations between Manchester City and Villa
The news will come as a disappointment to Liverpool and Villa. Roy Hodgson, the Liverpool manager, was keen to bring in the experienced defender to improve his options at full-back and also increase his quota of home-grown players, while Villa were eager to move on one of their higher earners as they look to reduce their £70m annual wage bill. Young was earning more than £2m a year at Villa and has three years remaining on his contract, with further signing-on fees due over the course of that period.
Liverpool had initially indicated Young would have to lower his demands, which have deterred interest from other clubs this summer, although when Martin O'Neill, the Villa manager, reported earlier in the week that a bid had been accepted it began to look like a deal might go through. That is no longer the case, leaving Young to continue his pre-season training in Portugal with Villa and O'Neill cursing a missed opportunity to free up some money.
The Villa manager has been told he will have to operate within the constraints of a "sell-to-buy" policy this summer, accentuating the need to move on a number of players on the periphery. At the moment, however, Steve Sidwell, Nigel-Reo-Coker, Habib Beye, Curtis Davies, Nicky Shorey and Young all remain Villa players. There has also been no progress with James Milner's situation despite ongoing negotiations between Manchester City and Villa
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:28 amsteviec wrote:europian-kings wrote:NANNY RED wrote:I really cant believe this im stunned,, Luke Young ffs. second choice at Villa, hes a right back ,what the feckin problem is wrong with Kelly and Derby, 2.5 MILLION for a 31 year old second rate defender, in a position that we have more than ample cover for, we need a top class left back and were wasting money which we dont have on a player like young
Im absolutly stunned by this
haha you won't like my comment above then Nanny
I better go hide
Also trying for Wayne Bridge. Jeez is that the best he can do! hes is feckin' USELESS, always was, and always will be. Man city reject - no thanks, we wanna be above them this year, not below 'em. so No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No, not worthy of the shirt
and there it is, since 2004 no less.
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:29 amDundalk wrote:Luke Young's proposed transfer to Liverpool collapsed today, leaving the full-back facing an uncertain future at Aston Villa. Liverpool had agreed a £2.5m fee with Villa on Tuesday for the former England international but there were suggestions that Young was unable to agree personal terms at Anfield as well as being reluctant to relocate to the north.
bollo5ks, he logged on here an read nanny's posts.
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:59 amI think we'll be signing Young in the next couple of days... Apparently agreed terms with the club already.... Not a bad deal imo.. Solid defender and exactly the sort of backup we need..
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 1:15 amaCe' wrote:I think we'll be signing Young in the next couple of days... Apparently agreed terms with the club already.... Not a bad deal imo.. Solid defender and exactly the sort of backup we need..
Not happening. He wants to go Fulham, he doesn't want to take his family up north. He also wanted a bigger wage.
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 6:05 amHopefully it WON'T happen...
2 million a year is 40k a week though... so it's not 70k a week...
2 million a year is 40k a week though... so it's not 70k a week...
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 9:08 amfk him then.
Well done son you just turned down the biggest chance of whats left of your time as a footballer. Jog on.
Well done son you just turned down the biggest chance of whats left of your time as a footballer. Jog on.
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:26 amneil wrote:Dundalk wrote:Luke Young's proposed transfer to Liverpool collapsed today, leaving the full-back facing an uncertain future at Aston Villa. Liverpool had agreed a £2.5m fee with Villa on Tuesday for the former England international but there were suggestions that Young was unable to agree personal terms at Anfield as well as being reluctant to relocate to the north.
bollo5ks, he logged on here an read nanny's posts.
I hope he fuc.kin did because i dont want him here
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:27 amNANNY RED wrote:I hope he fuc.kin did because i dont want him here
Me neither what a load of sh!te
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:42 pmmorcambe and wise have spoken.
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:52 pmWhy oh why would we want or need Luke Young ?! - He is a right back and we need a left back - people have been complaining about playing people out of position and here they agreeing with buying another right back who occassionally fills in at left back ?! and spending nearly 3 million on him as well -Young is a decent enough player who cant play at right back for Villa because they have a cb playing there ?
Kelly is a better player than him already .
Kelly is a better player than him already .