Page 3 of 3
Posted:
Thu Sep 27, 2007 11:42 pmby LFC2007
Sabre wrote:Yes that's fair enough. Plus there's the fact that we (I) sometimes forget that the regulars are not just the ones to read this, there could be children watching it and you must draw a line -- I realised of that when Ciggy made a good point about that when sex spam bots infested the forum.
Yes, but when the thread is entitled 'boobs', you know what to expect.
The pic's were not explicit, they were soft images.
There is nothing wrong with admiring the female form IMO.
The point about children reading the forum is irrelevant, children can view pic's of naked women at the click of a button on the web. If the thread is entitled 'boobs' then you know there is a chance there wll be exposed breasts waiting behind the cursor.
Posted:
Tue Oct 09, 2007 6:03 pmby dawson99
LFC2007 wrote:Sabre wrote:Yes that's fair enough. Plus there's the fact that we (I) sometimes forget that the regulars are not just the ones to read this, there could be children watching it and you must draw a line -- I realised of that when Ciggy made a good point about that when sex spam bots infested the forum.
Yes, but when the thread is entitled 'boobs', you know what to expect.
The pic's were not explicit, they were soft images.
There is nothing wrong with admiring the female form IMO.
The point about children reading the forum is irrelevant, children can view pic's of naked women at the click of a button on the web. If the thread is entitled 'boobs' then you know there is a chance there wll be exposed breasts waiting behind the cursor.
theres a lot of sites that are available that we definately dont want pictures of on here.
i actually agree, there should be no nudity ona family orientated football website.
but i also think there should be no torrent links, thats what gets my goat.
Posted:
Tue Oct 09, 2007 6:17 pmby LFC2007
dawson99 wrote:LFC2007 wrote:Sabre wrote:Yes that's fair enough. Plus there's the fact that we (I) sometimes forget that the regulars are not just the ones to read this, there could be children watching it and you must draw a line -- I realised of that when Ciggy made a good point about that when sex spam bots infested the forum.
Yes, but when the thread is entitled 'boobs', you know what to expect.
The pic's were not explicit, they were soft images.
There is nothing wrong with admiring the female form IMO.
The point about children reading the forum is irrelevant, children can view pic's of naked women at the click of a button on the web. If the thread is entitled 'boobs' then you know there is a chance there wll be exposed breasts waiting behind the cursor.
theres a lot of sites that are available that we definately dont want pictures of on here.
i actually agree, there should be no nudity ona family orientated football website.
but i also think there should be no torrent links, thats what gets my goat.
I'm not going to go into detail mate, I've had this debate time after time, if I could be arsed to repeat the many millions of PM's I've had I would, but as it happens I can't be fecked.
Posted:
Tue Oct 09, 2007 6:20 pmby dawson99
ok, heres the deal
fit birds and hunk stays
topless women AND topless men are not allowed.
everyone happy.
Posted:
Tue Oct 09, 2007 6:22 pmby LFC2007
dawson99 wrote:ok, heres the deal
fit birds and hunk stays
topless women AND topless men are not allowed.
everyone happy.
How about for a start, don't complain about the fit birds zone and then post pic's in the Hulk thread. Hypocrisy is the issue.
Posted:
Tue Oct 09, 2007 6:41 pmby account deleted by request
dawson99 wrote:LFC2007 wrote:Sabre wrote:Yes that's fair enough. Plus there's the fact that we (I) sometimes forget that the regulars are not just the ones to read this, there could be children watching it and you must draw a line -- I realised of that when Ciggy made a good point about that when sex spam bots infested the forum.
Yes, but when the thread is entitled 'boobs', you know what to expect.
The pic's were not explicit, they were soft images.
There is nothing wrong with admiring the female form IMO.
The point about children reading the forum is irrelevant, children can view pic's of naked women at the click of a button on the web. If the thread is entitled 'boobs' then you know there is a chance there wll be exposed breasts waiting behind the cursor.
theres a lot of sites that are available that we definately dont want pictures of on here.
i actually agree, there should be no nudity ona family orientated football website.
but i also think there should be no torrent links, thats what gets my goat.
Just bite the bullet and buy a computer Dawson all this sour grapes does you no good at all mate 
Maybe you could sell your goat to pay for it?
Posted:
Tue Oct 09, 2007 6:43 pmby dawson99
f*cking hell, imagine how many posts id have if i had a computer at home as well!!!!!
Posted:
Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:16 pmby The Manhattan Project
Poles, do you want them ?
Of course.
Britain's sex trade depends on them.
Posted:
Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:38 pmby dawson99
britains sex trade depends on jerzey dudek?
Posted:
Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:14 pmby The Manhattan Project
Did you know that when Hearts sign Lithuanian players they arrive via container ship?
Posted:
Tue Oct 16, 2007 9:55 amby Judge
babu wrote:
omg 
Posted:
Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:53 pmby zarababe
Posted:
Sat Oct 20, 2007 12:16 amby The Manhattan Project
babu wrote:
She's Polish?
