Liverpool FC Forum

Sabre wrote:Yes that's fair enough. Plus there's the fact that we (I) sometimes forget that the regulars are not just the ones to read this, there could be children watching it and you must draw a line -- I realised of that when Ciggy made a good point about that when sex spam bots infested the forum.

LFC2007 wrote:

Sabre wrote:Yes that's fair enough. Plus there's the fact that we (I) sometimes forget that the regulars are not just the ones to read this, there could be children watching it and you must draw a line -- I realised of that when Ciggy made a good point about that when sex spam bots infested the forum.

Yes, but when the thread is entitled 'boobs', you know what to expect.

The pic's were not explicit, they were soft images.

There is nothing wrong with admiring the female form IMO.

The point about children reading the forum is irrelevant, children can view pic's of naked women at the click of a button on the web. If the thread is entitled 'boobs' then you know there is a chance there wll be exposed breasts waiting behind the cursor.

dawson99 wrote:

LFC2007 wrote:

Sabre wrote:Yes that's fair enough. Plus there's the fact that we (I) sometimes forget that the regulars are not just the ones to read this, there could be children watching it and you must draw a line -- I realised of that when Ciggy made a good point about that when sex spam bots infested the forum.

Yes, but when the thread is entitled 'boobs', you know what to expect.

The pic's were not explicit, they were soft images.

There is nothing wrong with admiring the female form IMO.

The point about children reading the forum is irrelevant, children can view pic's of naked women at the click of a button on the web. If the thread is entitled 'boobs' then you know there is a chance there wll be exposed breasts waiting behind the cursor.

theres a lot of sites that are available that we definately dont want pictures of on here.

i actually agree, there should be no nudity ona  family orientated football website.

but i also think there should be no torrent links, thats what gets my goat.

dawson99 wrote:ok, heres the deal

fit birds and hunk stays

topless women AND topless men are not allowed.

everyone happy.

dawson99 wrote:

LFC2007 wrote:

Sabre wrote:Yes that's fair enough. Plus there's the fact that we (I) sometimes forget that the regulars are not just the ones to read this, there could be children watching it and you must draw a line -- I realised of that when Ciggy made a good point about that when sex spam bots infested the forum.

Yes, but when the thread is entitled 'boobs', you know what to expect.

The pic's were not explicit, they were soft images.

There is nothing wrong with admiring the female form IMO.

The point about children reading the forum is irrelevant, children can view pic's of naked women at the click of a button on the web. If the thread is entitled 'boobs' then you know there is a chance there wll be exposed breasts waiting behind the cursor.

theres a lot of sites that are available that we definately dont want pictures of on here.

i actually agree, there should be no nudity ona  family orientated football website.

but i also think there should be no torrent links, thats what gets my goat.

Just bite the bullet and buy a computer Dawson all this sour grapes does you no good at all mate

Maybe you could sell your goat to pay for it?

babu wrote:

omg 

woof woof ! wrote:In a bid to streamline the forum the poll section is being considered for possible termination.

It's your forum so Whadya think ?

Woof I thought this was another immigration thread 'poles'   

babu wrote: