Page 5 of 23

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:07 pm
by Ciggy
Big Niall wrote:I'm surprised Crouch hasn't asked for a transfer,

On this is Anfield last night they said Crouch was having talks with another club, and will probably be leaving this month.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:16 pm
by puroresu
i think crouch is off.  Out of the 3 of them crouch would command the biggest fee.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:23 pm
by Bermenstein
I heard Crouch to Man City part exchange deal with Stephen Ireland and cash coming the other way? ???? ????

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:52 pm
by maypaxvobiscum
stephen ireland? kidding right?

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:32 pm
by Bermenstein
No. I'll try to find you the link...

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:27 pm
by kop king
I wouldn't mind Steven Ireland coming in but would prefer it if we used Kuyt or Voronin as the exchange.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:32 pm
by club_Levis
Bermenstein wrote:I heard Crouch to Man City part exchange deal with Stephen Ireland and cash coming the other way? ???? ????

We should give them Riise as well in exchange for Richards.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:38 pm
by GRAHAM01
club_Levis wrote:
Bermenstein wrote:I heard Crouch to Man City part exchange deal with Stephen Ireland and cash coming the other way? ???? ????

We should give them Riise as well in exchange for Richards.

have you seen how much he is asking for in wages (£75000 a week)

i think that is a little over the top for a player who is still very young and who has been injured

yes he is a good! player but not sure he is that good

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:39 pm
by redmikey
steven fecking ireland, thats it i'm going off a bridge!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:52 pm
by El Nino_#9
its a shame about voronin really, he looked pretty decent during pre-season.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:05 pm
by Big Niall
Being Irish I should be patriotic but trust me - you don't want Stephen Ireland here.

First of all, he is a headcase - defo trouble.

Secondly - not good enough. He is a decent player but not good enough for LFC.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:21 pm
by Jeff .capes
lets look at the evidence

in pre season liverpool fans made big song and dance about voronin being possibly better than torres.
because of the fans raving about how good voronin was, rafa decided to leave the main man torres on the bench.

so if you want to know why voronin plays,its because we told rafa we liked voronin.
suddenly things go wrong and people forget why they liked voronin.

for a free transfer that does not kick up a fuss when left out and wants to be at liverpool,i have no problem with voronin being a squad player but i do have a problem with kuyt being a 1st team player.:blues:

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:23 pm
by LittleHobo
i dont blame voronin for being average....it aint his fault,hes always played like this

i blame rafa for signing him and then putting him ahead of crouch and babel in the striking pecking order

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:25 pm
by Paul C
Jeff .capes wrote:lets look at the evidence

in pre season liverpool fans made big song and dance about voronin being possibly better than torres.
because of the fans raving about how good voronin was, rafa decided to leave the main man torres on the bench.

so if you want to know why voronin plays,its because we told rafa we liked voronin.
suddenly things go wrong and people forget why they liked voronin.

for a free transfer that does not kick up a fuss when left out and wants to be at liverpool,i have no problem with voronin being a squad player but i do have a problem with kuyt being a 1st team player.:blues:

So Rafa plays the team that the fans want  :no

Fully agreed about Kuyt....................... £10m  :oops:  :down:

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:31 pm
by Big Niall
Rafa was clearly "had" over Kuyt.

As for Voninin, I don't mind if he plays tonight with kuyt/crouch - rest Torres ( I know I always complain about rotation but I don't mind a weakened team in the FA cup)