Liverpool FC Forum

Mikel kicks Parker, should have been sent off, but this referee is as blind as a bat.

Florent Malouda makes it 5.

damjan193 » Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:50 pm wrote:

Benny The Noon » Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:46 pm wrote:That wasn't a red card offense though

Making a late tackle on a player who is clear on goal without getting the ball is a straight red for me.

He would only get sent off for denying a goalscoring opportunity.

@Twisted_Blood: Interesting fact. One of Martin Atkinson's ancestors was lookout on the Titanic.


Lol

Absolutely disgraceful lowlife street urchins ,classless cuntz ,spineless soulless twats with velcro bum flaps .
We don't want these bastards paying tribute anyway ,I personally dont want these cuntz associated with
the 96 in any way shape or form .....Theyve just ensured  Wembley Way will be a fucking blood bath 

Hope Barcelona embarrass the fucking life out of them ,a ritual humiliation will do nicely .

Benny The Noon » Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:54 am wrote:

damjan193 » Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:50 pm wrote:

Benny The Noon » Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:46 pm wrote:That wasn't a red card offense though

Making a late tackle on a player who is clear on goal without getting the ball is a straight red for me.

He would only get sent off for denying a goalscoring opportunity.

Agree with Benny here.  Bale scored, so Cech didn't deny the opportunity, they still scored.  Not only that, but I've always felt a keeper should never been sent off for that, unless it's obvious they fouled them on purpose.  Cech clearly went for the ball and Adebayor tapped the ball past him so he could run into Cech and get him sent off.  Yakubu did the same thing against us.  Technically it's a red card, but it's stupid they punish keepers for trying to make a save, they've already got a pen.

Chelsea showing they're classless counts, but you have to imagine the players don't like seeing that *****.  They were't very good today and still won against a poor spurs side who outplayed them for large parts.  Glad it's chelsea in the final, we can beat them.  I'm never comfortable playing spurs, so I'd have to say I'm happy.

I'm not saying that it isn't stupid Ethan but the rules are the rules. So as far as I know, after giving the advantage, refs go back and sanction the players who made the late tackle. Shouldn't have been any different today IMO.

RED BEERGOGGLES » Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:08 pm wrote:Absolutely disgraceful lowlife street urchins ,classless cuntz ,spineless soulless twats with velcro bum flaps .
We don't want these bastards paying tribute anyway ,I personally dont want these cuntz associated with
the 96 in any way shape or form .....Theyve just ensured  Wembley Way will be a fucking blood bath 

Hope Barcelona embarrass the fucking life out of them ,a ritual humiliation will do nicely .

amen

I hope we really batter them in the final.

They didn't even wear blackarm bands FFS, disrespectful tw@ts, even Torres didn't

metalhead » Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:31 pm wrote:

RED BEERGOGGLES » Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:08 pm wrote:Absolutely disgraceful lowlife street urchins ,classless cuntz ,spineless soulless twats with velcro bum flaps .
We don't want these bastards paying tribute anyway ,I personally dont want these cuntz associated with
the 96 in any way shape or form .....Theyve just ensured  Wembley Way will be a fucking blood bath 

Hope Barcelona embarrass the fucking life out of them ,a ritual humiliation will do nicely .

amen

I hope we really batter them in the final.

They didn't even wear blackarm bands FFS, disrespectful tw@ts, even Torres didn't

Apparently only the first 11 wear armbands

Chelsea or Spurs, it didn't bother me who we get, just as long as we win the trophy, I don't mind.

Benny The Noon » Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:36 pm wrote:

metalhead » Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:31 pm wrote:

RED BEERGOGGLES » Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:08 pm wrote:Absolutely disgraceful lowlife street urchins ,classless cuntz ,spineless soulless twats with velcro bum flaps .
We don't want these bastards paying tribute anyway ,I personally dont want these cuntz associated with
the 96 in any way shape or form .....Theyve just ensured  Wembley Way will be a fucking blood bath 

Hope Barcelona embarrass the fucking life out of them ,a ritual humiliation will do nicely .

amen

I hope we really batter them in the final.

They didn't even wear blackarm bands FFS, disrespectful tw@ts, even Torres didn't

Apparently only the first 11 wear armbands

ah... so Terry is a c*nt

damjan193 » Sun Apr 15, 2012 11:25 am wrote:I'm not saying that it isn't stupid Ethan but the rules are the rules. So as far as I know, after giving the advantage, refs go back and sanction the players who made the late tackle. Shouldn't have been any different today IMO.

Ya I get what you're saying, but I believe according the the rules because the goal was scored, the opportunity was not denied.  Adebayor didn't score, but they still got the ball in the back of the net so the opportunity wasn't lost, so there's no booking unless the foul was a bad enough foul that it deserved a booking in itself.

I could be wrong tho.

damjan193 » Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:25 pm wrote:I'm not saying that it isn't stupid Ethan but the rules are the rules. So as far as I know, after giving the advantage, refs go back and sanction the players who made the late tackle. Shouldn't have been any different today IMO.

It was a keeper going for the ball - it wasnt a nasty tackle, it isn't the same as an outfield player tackling late. The only thing he could of been punished for is denying a goalscoring opportunity . I think you can't see the difference.

hardly surprised by the chelsea fans. lowlife scum. it was planned all along:

http://www.pieandbovril.com/forum/index ... s-silence/

ethanr » Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:19 pm wrote:

damjan193 » Sun Apr 15, 2012 11:25 am wrote:I'm not saying that it isn't stupid Ethan but the rules are the rules. So as far as I know, after giving the advantage, refs go back and sanction the players who made the late tackle. Shouldn't have been any different today IMO.

Ya I get what you're saying, but I believe according the the rules because the goal was scored, the opportunity was not denied.  Adebayor didn't score, but they still got the ball in the back of the net so the opportunity wasn't lost, so there's no booking unless the foul was a bad enough foul that it deserved a booking in itself.

I could be wrong tho.

That is 100% correct

ethanr » Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:19 pm wrote:

damjan193 » Sun Apr 15, 2012 11:25 am wrote:I'm not saying that it isn't stupid Ethan but the rules are the rules. So as far as I know, after giving the advantage, refs go back and sanction the players who made the late tackle. Shouldn't have been any different today IMO.

Ya I get what you're saying, but I believe according the the rules because the goal was scored, the opportunity was not denied.  Adebayor didn't score, but they still got the ball in the back of the net so the opportunity wasn't lost, so there's no booking unless the foul was a bad enough foul that it deserved a booking in itself.

I could be wrong tho.

I see. But I've seen a game where a player denies a goal with his hand (like Suarez against Ghana in the WC ) but the ball goes back to the opposition immediately and they score. After they scored the player that did the handball got booked. Isn't it a similar situation like with Cech, denying a goalscoring opportunity?