Page 2 of 3

PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:16 pm
by Kharhaz
So, whats the difference between this case and the George Graham case? Aside from the outcome obviously.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:24 pm
by metalhead
Good old England :D

PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:24 pm
by jacdaniel
Typical, the media creaming themselves for Harry to become England manager now and want rid of Capello. 
Reminds me of when the media wanted us to get rid of big bad Rafa and appoint Roy Hodgson

PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:30 pm
by stmichael
what a triffic day

PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:40 pm
by red till i die!!
jacdaniel wrote:Typical, the media creaming themselves for Harry to become England manager now and want rid of Capello. 
Reminds me of when the media wanted us to get rid of big bad Rafa and appoint Roy Hodgson

thats the truth.
wouldnt surprise me at all if the media and f.a hound capello out before the euros.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 5:39 pm
by Roger Red Hat
yeah, Harry is a tax dodging tw@t!  he's only paid £8 million in taxes and been found not guilty of tax evasion... hang on ???

PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 6:02 pm
by RedSi35
5 years and 8 million of tax payers money down the drain.......what was the :censored: point?

PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 7:20 pm
by Ola Mr Benitez
dawson99 wrote:
Ola Mr Benitez wrote:I like 'arry.  Made up he got off with it.  :buttrock

any reason?

Is it the way he is more dodgy than anyone?

Is it how he leaves a club and they go into administration?

Can't stand the guy

Coz he is a proper old school football guy, who is a brilliant football manager. His record at every club he has been at is amazing.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 8:31 pm
by Greavesie
:laugh: :laugh:  Capello gone. Have the job Arry lad!

PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:14 pm
by SouthCoastShankly
Hang on a minute. I agree there is an element of ??? To this case but Harry has been acquitted unanimously by a jury. Like it or not the justice system dictates that without sufficient evidence you cannot be convicted.

With the evidence available Harry's legal team have successfully convinced all of the jury that his payments were gifts not business and not subject to income tax.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 11:24 pm
by worcester_red
SouthCoastShankly wrote:Hang on a minute. I agree there is an element of ??? To this case but Harry has been acquitted unanimously by a jury. Like it or not the justice system dictates that without sufficient evidence you cannot be convicted.

With the evidence available Harry's legal team have successfully convinced all of the jury that his payments were gifts not business and not subject to income tax.

£200,000 gift, feck me the jury must have received a few brown envelopes to reach that conclusion. Of course it was bloody tax evasion Arry is as dodgy as they come.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:17 am
by fivecups
worcester_red wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:Hang on a minute. I agree there is an element of ??? To this case but Harry has been acquitted unanimously by a jury. Like it or not the justice system dictates that without sufficient evidence you cannot be convicted.

With the evidence available Harry's legal team have successfully convinced all of the jury that his payments were gifts not business and not subject to income tax.

£200,000 gift, feck me the jury must have received a few brown envelopes to reach that conclusion. Of course it was bloody tax evasion Arry is as dodgy as they come.

Looking forward to seeing the details of this. Agreed Wor it sounds bizarre to me.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:27 am
by Roger Red Hat
worcester_red wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:Hang on a minute. I agree there is an element of ??? To this case but Harry has been acquitted unanimously by a jury. Like it or not the justice system dictates that without sufficient evidence you cannot be convicted.

With the evidence available Harry's legal team have successfully convinced all of the jury that his payments were gifts not business and not subject to income tax.

£200,000 gift, feck me the jury must have received a few brown envelopes to reach that conclusion. Of course it was bloody tax evasion Arry is as dodgy as they come.

thats quite a slanderous statement but i look forward to you present your evidence to uncover this scandel...

PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 11:28 am
by dawson99
and hours after he is aquitted Capello quits. Nothing dodgy in that at all LOL

And we say the rest of the football is crooked

PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 4:16 pm
by SouthCoastShankly
worcester_red wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:Hang on a minute. I agree there is an element of ??? To this case but Harry has been acquitted unanimously by a jury. Like it or not the justice system dictates that without sufficient evidence you cannot be convicted.

With the evidence available Harry's legal team have successfully convinced all of the jury that his payments were gifts not business and not subject to income tax.

£200,000 gift, feck me the jury must have received a few brown envelopes to reach that conclusion. Of course it was bloody tax evasion Arry is as dodgy as they come.

You cannot honestly think that 12 randomly selected jurors who voted unanimously for Redknapp were all paid off?

:D