Liverpool FC Forum

heimdall wrote:do you remember how dominant Manure were at that point, Maureen did an amazing job to win it in his first season, and bear in mind it's not about how much you spend but also how well you spend it and mold the team etc.

well the year ranieri finished second it was arsenal who were the champions, that was the year when they went the entire season unbeaten, but ranieri finished above united himself when he was sacked.
ranieri actually lined up and bought robben and cech as well before he left, mourinho joined a team that had finished second the season before, got to the CL semi finals and had the likes of petr cech, john terry, frank lampard, joe cole, damian duff, arjen robben, claude makelele, william gallas etc in the squad plus on top of that he got even more money to spend the squad.
any manager taking over in that situation especially with the backing of an open chequebook would fancy their chances to do well. that was no miracle at chelsea, he never built a team from scratch or took over a struggling side.

Sick of hearing all of the Mourinho rubbish to be honest and all the hype that surrounds him.  No doubt they'll be saying he toppled Barca if he manages to win the title over there.

heimdall:

"?? I'm confused wasn't the intital discussion about having maureen as the next manager of LFC, then someone said yeah but he'd only leave to which I and others correctly pointed out that even after he left Chelsea were far better off than they were before he was their manager. In other words if we could afford him he would be a very very good manager for us. Am I making myself clear enough now or to many long words for you?"

Thanks for imparting your wisdom on me

Fu'ckin hell its like being taught how to write by a chimp!

I dont give a flying fu'ck what Mourinho did at chelsea, or what state he left them in, or what they won after he went.
I care about KK being our manager here and now and refuse to discuss his sacking for someone like the special one coming here in his place.
People should show a bit of loyalty instead of undermining KK with hypothetical bo'llox about something which will never happen
Ya dig?

mourinho is a circus and a flaming nobsack and how would we feel when he ***** off for the manure job when its available.
liverpool might be good for maureen but i wouldnt think maureen would be good for liverpool.
if kenny feels in the summer that its as far as he can take us and steps down then thats fine with me and if he takes us into next season then thats good enough for me also.
other than that id rather see benitez back with kenny remaining on as coach than letting mourinho anyway near the place.

Jurgen Klopp would be a good shout in my opinion.

ycsatbjywtbiastkamb wrote:

heimdall wrote:do you remember how dominant Manure were at that point, Maureen did an amazing job to win it in his first season, and bear in mind it's not about how much you spend but also how well you spend it and mold the team etc.

well the year ranieri finished second it was arsenal who were the champions, that was the year when they went the entire season unbeaten, but ranieri finished above united himself when he was sacked.
ranieri actually lined up and bought robben and cech as well before he left, mourinho joined a team that had finished second the season before, got to the CL semi finals and had the likes of petr cech, john terry, frank lampard, joe cole, damian duff, arjen robben, claude makelele, william gallas etc in the squad plus on top of that he got even more money to spend the squad.
any manager taking over in that situation especially with the backing of an open chequebook would fancy their chances to do well. that was no miracle at chelsea, he never built a team from scratch or took over a struggling side.

I stand corrected, but I still don't think it's right to not give the man respect, he did a fantastic job at Chelsea and is a hell of a manager but I'm not entirely convinced he's right for Liverpool. To be honest I'm not quite sure who I'd like to see take over, but I'm coming around to the idea of Rafa, he took us very very close on a tight budget before the civil war erupted and he justifiably got ***** off with it all.

Thommo's perm wrote:heimdall:

"?? I'm confused wasn't the intital discussion about having maureen as the next manager of LFC, then someone said yeah but he'd only leave to which I and others correctly pointed out that even after he left Chelsea were far better off than they were before he was their manager. In other words if we could afford him he would be a very very good manager for us. Am I making myself clear enough now or to many long words for you?"

Thanks for imparting your wisdom on me

Fu'ckin hell its like being taught how to write by a chimp!

I dont give a flying fu'ck what Mourinho did at chelsea, or what state he left them in, or what they won after he went.
I care about KK being our manager here and now and refuse to discuss his sacking for someone like the special one coming here in his place.
People should show a bit of loyalty instead of undermining KK with hypothetical bo'llox about something which will never happen
Ya dig?

You always take things so personally, and judging by your limited vocabulary and propensity towards vulgarity perhaps you do need a few writing lessons, certainly some netiquette wouldn't go amiss.

By the way, just out of curiosity, did you also pledge unfailing loyalty to Hodgson when he was the manager? 

7_Kewell wrote:Jurgen Klopp would be a good shout in my opinion.

I second that, outstanding manager.

I cannot believe people are talking about a new manager, what fickle bunch. 

Kenny Kan wrote:I cannot believe people are talking about a new manager, what fickle bunch. 

The mostest ficklest ever! 

heimdall wrote:

Thommo's perm wrote:heimdall:

"?? I'm confused wasn't the intital discussion about having maureen as the next manager of LFC, then someone said yeah but he'd only leave to which I and others correctly pointed out that even after he left Chelsea were far better off than they were before he was their manager. In other words if we could afford him he would be a very very good manager for us. Am I making myself clear enough now or to many long words for you?"

Thanks for imparting your wisdom on me

Fu'ckin hell its like being taught how to write by a chimp!

I dont give a flying fu'ck what Mourinho did at chelsea, or what state he left them in, or what they won after he went.
I care about KK being our manager here and now and refuse to discuss his sacking for someone like the special one coming here in his place.
People should show a bit of loyalty instead of undermining KK with hypothetical bo'llox about something which will never happen
Ya dig?

You always take things so personally, and judging by your limited vocabulary and propensity towards vulgarity perhaps you do need a few writing lessons, certainly some netiquette wouldn't go amiss.

By the way, just out of curiosity, did you also pledge unfailing loyalty to Hodgson when he was the manager? 

Fu'ck you and your "netiquette"!

7_Kewell wrote:Jurgen Klopp would be a good shout in my opinion.

Chelsea were reportedly interested in him and he flat out rejected their advances.

Reg wrote:

Kenny Kan wrote:I cannot believe people are talking about a new manager, what fickle bunch. 

The mostest ficklest ever! 

If the cap fits...

Notice your little (big) sig there Reginald - is that to prove you're not the ficklest LFC "fan" on these boards? 

Kenny Kan wrote:

Reg wrote:

Kenny Kan wrote:I cannot believe people are talking about a new manager, what fickle bunch. 

The mostest ficklest ever! 

If the cap fits...

Notice your little (big) sig there Reginald - is that to prove you're not the ficklest LFC "fan" on these boards?