Page 16 of 17

Re: Glen johnson out........a good thing? i think so

PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 3:12 pm
by LFC2007
Fowler_E7 » Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:24 pm wrote: I was waiting for you to pull out one of your old favourites, Ryan Taylor better than Johnson lol behave yourself. Ryan Taylor, Dean Ashton and who was the other one you used to love  :rasp  :D


Joey Barton.

Jimmy Bullard is another I seem to recall  :D

Re: Glen johnson out........a good thing? i think so

PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 3:17 pm
by devaney
redno7 » Thu Sep 05, 2013 9:14 am wrote:
StuYesThatStu » Wed Sep 04, 2013 7:05 pm wrote:
Fowler_E7 » Wed Sep 04, 2013 8:02 pm wrote:Johnson is an excellent right back, very rounded in that he can do a bit of everything. Excellent athlete and a massive threat going forward, gets a lot of unfair criticism in my opinion.


Doesn't get enough for me  :D



can we get shut of this idiot once and for all? I don't know who the fuk you think you are but quite frankly I find you irritating as hell coming on here and abusing our team and our players. then passing it off as though it's a big laugh!


Bit over the top mate. I think Stu adds a lot and to be honest I'm glad he's back. He is passionate about LFC and is certainly entitled to his opinion even if some of it is shite

He certainly doesn't come across as all doom and gloom and he's got a sense of humour which helps.....

Re: Glen johnson out........a good thing? i think so

PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 3:21 pm
by redno7
he irritated me as soon as he started pulling apart my team. you all obviously knew him from his previous identity so thats good for you. crack on.

Re: Glen johnson out........a good thing? i think so

PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 3:26 pm
by devaney
redno7 » Thu Sep 05, 2013 2:21 pm wrote:he irritated me as soon as he started pulling apart my team. you all obviously knew him from his previous identity so thats good for you. crack on.


Enjoy the ride mate. Stu will add a bit of well needed spice to the discussions.That has been needed for a while. He's not all doom and gloom. There is a difference.

Re: Glen johnson out........a good thing? i think so

PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 3:34 pm
by Fowler_E7
LFC2007 » Thu Sep 05, 2013 2:12 pm wrote:
Fowler_E7 » Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:24 pm wrote: I was waiting for you to pull out one of your old favourites, Ryan Taylor better than Johnson lol behave yourself. Ryan Taylor, Dean Ashton and who was the other one you used to love  :rasp  :D


Joey Barton.

Jimmy Bullard is another I seem to recall  :D


Bullard thats the one! he was obsessed with him Ashton and Taylor  :D all good players to be fair

Re: Glen johnson out........a good thing? i think so

PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 7:48 pm
by devaney
redno7 » Thu Sep 05, 2013 2:21 pm wrote:he irritated me as soon as he started pulling apart my team. you all obviously knew him from his previous identity so thats good for you. crack on.


Shit I've just read the debate in another thread about opinion and fact - fk I think you're right !!!!  :laugh:  :laugh:  :laugh:

Re: Glen johnson out........a good thing? i think so

PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:44 pm
by Stu the Red
Sorry I forgot, you have to play for Liverpool or a top four side or be in the papers every week to be any good...

God forbid there are other good players in this country who don't play for Liverpool... :laugh:

Re: Glen johnson out........a good thing? i think so

PostPosted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 1:36 am
by Kenny Kan
That's right, Dean Ashton :laugh:

Hey Stu, I'm trying to convince the forum that Titus Bramble  is Lilian Thuram post 30kg, give us a hand.  :laugh:

Re: Glen johnson out........a good thing? i think so

PostPosted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 7:05 am
by woof woof !
StuYesThatStu » Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:33 pm wrote:So do you think Mourinho got sacked because he sold Johnson then Woof? :D

And even you can't believe he chose us over Chelsea... :laugh:


No mate but I doubt it did anything to improve the increasingly fractious relationship between Mourinho and Chelseas' owner.

As for choosing us over Chelsea

From Wicki
A Portsmouth representative confirmed on 13 June 2009 that a "sizeable bid" had been received for Johnson, with Chelsea, Liverpool and Manchester City being mooted as possible suitors.[29][30] On 16 June 2009, Portsmouth agreed a bid believed to be £17.5 million from Liverpool. However, two days later Portsmouth confirmed they had also accepted a bid from Chelsea and it was up to the player as to who he wanted to join. Liverpool were believed to have tabled the £10m bid on the basis that they were still owed £7m by Portsmouth from the purchase of Peter Crouch in the summer of 2008, with Liverpool willing to reduce the fee owed on signing Johnson.[31] On 22 June 2009, Liverpool announced the transfer[32] and on 26 June 2009, Johnson signed a four-year contract.[33] He was officially unveiled on 9 July 2009.


:;):

Re: Glen johnson out........a good thing? i think so

PostPosted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 7:31 am
by devaney
woof woof ! » Fri Sep 06, 2013 6:05 am wrote:
StuYesThatStu » Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:33 pm wrote:So do you think Mourinho got sacked because he sold Johnson then Woof? :D

And even you can't believe he chose us over Chelsea... :laugh:


No mate but I doubt it did anything to improve the increasingly fractious relationship between Mourinho and Chelseas' owner.

As for choosing us over Chelsea

From Wicki
A Portsmouth representative confirmed on 13 June 2009 that a "sizeable bid" had been received for Johnson, with Chelsea, Liverpool and Manchester City being mooted as possible suitors.[29][30] On 16 June 2009, Portsmouth agreed a bid believed to be £17.5 million from Liverpool. However, two days later Portsmouth confirmed they had also accepted a bid from Chelsea and it was up to the player as to who he wanted to join. Liverpool were believed to have tabled the £10m bid on the basis that they were still owed £7m by Portsmouth from the purchase of Peter Crouch in the summer of 2008, with Liverpool willing to reduce the fee owed on signing Johnson.[31] On 22 June 2009, Liverpool announced the transfer[32] and on 26 June 2009, Johnson signed a four-year contract.[33] He was officially unveiled on 9 July 2009.


:;):


Ouch !!! Stu will be hurling something at his computer just about now exclaiming: Fk that can't be right I know everything - where is that bleedin Wiki page I'll change it instantly to make sure nobody else is mislead !!!  :laugh:

Only joking Stu. I love your shit !!!

Re: Glen johnson out........a good thing? i think so

PostPosted: Sat Sep 07, 2013 12:59 pm
by Stu the Red
Liverpool were believed to have tabled the £10m bid on the basis that they were still owed £7m by Portsmouth from the purchase of Peter Crouch in the summer of 2008, with Liverpool willing to reduce the fee owed on signing Johnson.


Yeah...

Exactly.

Kind of a bit like whenever a player signs for a new side they were always "a fan" growning up.

Re: Glen johnson out........a good thing? i think so

PostPosted: Sat Sep 07, 2013 10:47 pm
by Scottbot
Jonno had a good game last Sunday, the tackle he hurt himself on was right in front of me and was about as committed a tackle as i've ever seen, had me on me feet nearly as much as the goal!

Re: Glen johnson out........a good thing? i think so

PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2013 12:24 pm
by stmichael
Mirror saying he could be out for "up to 10 weeks".

Re: Glen johnson out........a good thing? i think so

PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2013 12:41 pm
by ycsatbjywtbiastkamb
heard he`s out for up to 10 weeks which is a huge blow if true, thats practically 3 months.
not only does that break up a defence that hasnt conceded a goal in the prem this season it will also most probably mean that wisdom will be our RB until near christmas.
andre did well when he came on against united but after what happened in last seasons goodison derby opposition teams will deffo see him as a possible weakness.
to be fair to the lad he`s spent 90% of his career as a CB so defending one on one situations against flying wingers isnt natural to him, big sami was a great CB but he would have made an awful fullback, it`s testament to wisdoms athleticism that he can go into the first team as a RB and do a job.
he`s a year older and wiser than last season and thats quite a big deal when your a developing player, look at the strides hendo has made in a year.

Re: Glen johnson out........a good thing? i think so

PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2013 12:42 pm
by stmichael
i'd consider changing to three at the back. we've got an abundance of centre halves now and you could use henderson as a right wing back in that formation.