Page 2 of 2
Posted:
Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:14 pmby Toffeehater
Torres
Gerrard is the life and heart of LFC , not torres , . No disrespect meant to carragher who pratically would kill for this club . He is the unsung hero but I've lost couns the amount of times that gerrard has dug us out of ditches . Gerrard can never be replaced by no amount of money . Fact .
Posted:
Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:49 pmby The Manhattan Project
Manhattan named his testicles "Torres" and "Gerrard" and then you come up with a thread like this?
Have you no human decency?
Asking a man to choose between his testicles.
Posted:
Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:33 pmby SundanceKid
The Manhattan Project wrote:Manhattan named his testicles "Torres" and "Gerrard" and then you come up with a thread like this?
Have you no human decency?
Asking a man to choose between his testicles.
Hahahahahahahahaaha.
If we were to sell now, sell Torres. But if it were in a few years, sell Gerrard. Not that he's no longer useful, but he wouldn't have many years of football left in him.
Posted:
Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:37 pmby Kharhaz
dawson99 wrote:1: Liverpool HAVE to sell one player, Torres or Gerrard. Which do you sell and why?
(don't kill me for this q, im just bored and wondered if people could pick between the 2)
I cant pick between the two as they both compliment each other brilliantly so I would choose neither. Sell the rest ! (of course keep carra !)
Posted:
Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:55 amby Owzat
It would boil down to which position we could cover without the respective parties and that for me would be midfield since Voronin, Kuyt and Crouch managed about as many goals between them as Torres on his own. Saying that Gerrard himself scored plenty but in an advanced role so toughie but that's how I would choose.
Posted:
Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:57 amby andy_g
sell gerrard. we need to freshen things up a little and we'll have barry to replace him anyway.
Posted:
Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:59 amby Rafa D
Torres - we wouldn't get 50m for Gerrard.
Posted:
Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:01 pmby Owzat
Rafa-Dodd wrote:Torres - we wouldn't get 50m for Gerrard.
Perhaps therein lies the answer............................ Keep an asset people wouldn't pay £50m and sell one people would or vice versa, ask yourself which is in greater demand.
And isn't SG nearing 30? Must be well past mid 20s
Posted:
Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:04 pmby hello_red
Owzat wrote:Rafa-Dodd wrote:Torres - we wouldn't get 50m for Gerrard.
Perhaps therein lies the answer............................ Keep an asset people wouldn't pay £50m and sell one people would or vice versa, ask yourself which is in greater demand.
And isn't SG nearing 30? Must be well past mid 20s
He turned 28 very recently.
Posted:
Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:07 pmby Owzat
hello_red wrote:Owzat wrote:Rafa-Dodd wrote:Torres - we wouldn't get 50m for Gerrard.
Perhaps therein lies the answer............................ Keep an asset people wouldn't pay £50m and sell one people would or vice versa, ask yourself which is in greater demand.
And isn't SG nearing 30? Must be well past mid 20s
He turned 28 very recently.
Torres has more years ahead of him, may well have a good season next season 
and we've craved a Torres since Fowler and then Owen departed.
And don't be too surprised if we couldn't get over £30m for Gerrard, Chelsea want him badly and so do other clubs. We can dictate terms in that deal like we could with Torres, getting a club to part with a striker as good as Torres would take some doing
Posted:
Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:09 pmby Bad Bob
andy_g wrote:sell gerrard. we need to freshen things up a little and we'll have barry to replace him anyway.