Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:45 pmHeinze does not need to buy himself out of a contract in order to leave United.
Liverpool FC Forum
Liverpool Football Club Discussion
https://www.liverpoolfc-newkit.co.uk/
No go on heinze - He missed the deadline
Page 2 of 7
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:45 pmPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 4:24 pmHe had a stinker in the final of the Copa America. Fuck him, anyway. I must be the only one on this forum that doesn't rate him at all. Some people say they are gutted? I'd be gutted to see him wear our red. Happy days, then!
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 4:50 pmLeonmc0708 wrote:Heinze does not need to buy himself out of a contract in order to leave United.
tell us more Leon…
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 5:32 pmfowler4ever wrote:ooh united and their double standards again, rummy nose talks about Tevez and how the player should have the choice to Join whatever club he wants and play for a bigger club, and then Tells the Press there is no way he would consider letting Heinze sign for us even tho the guy would like to join a bigger club..............
what a complete bum wipe
Yeah good point but i was never really hoping for this one to come off anyway.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 5:55 pmAde wrote:Leonmc0708 wrote:Heinze does not need to buy himself out of a contract in order to leave United.
tell us more Leon…
He could just tell the alcoholic
i'm fcking leaving, and i want to join Liverpool. All players can decide where they go...unless its Tevez/Masher. Mods join this to Heinze thread.Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:01 pmWhy if we are looking to overhaul United this season, would we want to buy one of their players who can't even cement a place in the United 1st team? Surely if he's not good enough for them, then he's not good enough for Liverpool
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:18 pmgod_bless_john_houlding wrote:Why if we are looking to overhaul United this season, would we want to buy one of their players who can't even cement a place in the United 1st team? Surely if he's not good enough for them, then he's not good enough for Liverpool
Hes much better than Riiise.
Thats the reason why.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:36 pmfair enough murphy
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 7:08 pmmurphy0151 wrote:god_bless_john_houlding wrote:Why if we are looking to overhaul United this season, would we want to buy one of their players who can't even cement a place in the United 1st team? Surely if he's not good enough for them, then he's not good enough for Liverpool
Hes much better than Riiise.
Thats the reason why.
Are you disbanding the Riise fan club then Muuuuurrrrfff ?
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 7:10 pmAde wrote:Leonmc0708 wrote:Heinze does not need to buy himself out of a contract in order to leave United.
tell us more Leon…
If a player wants to leave a club then they can give a transfer request in, or just request a move.
This happens all the time, and the club are essentially powerless to do anything.
If a player buys out his contract then they dont need to get the club involved at all as they become a free agent.
Article 17 (the ruling to which the original poster refered) was only written two years ago, with the precedent set by the lad who left Hearts for Wigan.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 7:57 pmLeonmc0708 wrote:murphy0151 wrote:god_bless_john_houlding wrote:Why if we are looking to overhaul United this season, would we want to buy one of their players who can't even cement a place in the United 1st team? Surely if he's not good enough for them, then he's not good enough for Liverpool
Hes much better than Riiise.
Thats the reason why.
Are you disbanding the Riise fan club then Muuuuurrrrfff ?
Hopefully not for long.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:26 pmI'd take Riise over Heinze any day, his defensive awareness at times may not be as strong but he's younger and much more versatile.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:37 pmRafa-Dodd wrote:He's English for a start, and I fully believe we need to bring in a few more England players who know exactly what our football in all about. Its no concidence to me that Chelsea and United are full of English stars, because thats why they do so well in the season.
Dont agree with your point here, we have almost as many british players in our team as chelsea or Man utd do, we have Crouch, Pennant, Gerrard, Finnan, Carragher, and Carson in the first team squad, plus Harry Kewell (7)who though he is Australian has been playing in England since he was a kid and has never played foriegn football.
Man Utd have Carrick, Hargreaves, Rooney, Brown, Ferdinand, Scholes, Giggs, Neville, O'shea, Smith, Flethcher and foster in there first team squad. (12)
Chelsea have Terry, Lampard, A. Cole, J.Cole, Wright-Phillips, Bridge, Johnson, and Sidwell (8)in there first team squad.
We still have a good core of British players, which is only slightly less than Man Utd or Chelsea have, i mean were no were near as bad as Arsenal.
I have no problem with us buying English talent, but i dont think we should be buying players because there english, like its and en extra skill or something, its the quality thats the most important thing.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:38 pmForget Heinze, I don't want anybody from that scum United. If we are in desperate need of a left back, my personal favourite would be either Matty Taylor or Leighton Baines. 2 young lads who would jump at the chance to move to Liverpool.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:42 pmgod_bless_john_houlding wrote:Forget Heinze, I don't want anybody from that scum United. If we are in desperate need of a left back, my personal favourite would be either Matty Taylor or Leighton Baines. 2 young lads who would jump at the chance to move to Liverpool.
Baines maybe, he looks a decent prospect but i doubt we could get him for the same price we were looking at Heinze for(£6mil), didnt Wigan reject something like a £7 mil bid from sunderland for him? he looks quite good but not over £5 million pound good IMO. As for Taylor why people keep going on about him is beyond me, he has a good shot and a good engine but nothing else, he would get completly exposed playing left back at our level.