Liverpool FC Forum

NANNY RED wrote:

Greavesie wrote:

NANNY RED wrote:

Greavesie wrote:

NANNY RED wrote:Do you wanna know what im voting ,

come on then I'm on the edge of my seat here! 

How much are you gonna pay me if i tell you 

what else will you do if I pay you? 

Yeh getting cheeky now , yeh need your ars.e smacked ,you little urchin you.

Anyway you can stick me down in this camp

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9d3KYaI0U14

andy_g wrote:go


but not as in 'feck of you stupid fat waiter you useless piece of muck you haven't got a bleeding clue'

but as in 'thanks for giving it a decent shot at times, rafa, but i don't think you're the right fella for the job anymore'

Ben Patrick wrote:

andy_g wrote:go


but not as in 'feck of you stupid fat waiter you useless piece of muck you haven't got a bleeding clue'

but as in 'thanks for giving it a decent shot at times, rafa, but i don't think you're the right fella for the job anymore'

Thats exactly where i am mate.

roberto green wrote:

"We've got lumps of it 'round the back !"

"eh?"

"Dont mind him sir hes Mmmmm....hes mmmmmmmmm.....hes mad sir !"



Love that film.

Penguins wrote:I am undecided for 2 reasons.

1. That 16 million payment will come get taken from somewhere and will hurt us most likely transferwise. Why? Cause now all expenses seem to be bundled up into one pot, where transfer budget, wages etc all comes from the same place.
And we know the owners would never pay for it themselves so the club will somehow take the hit.

2. I am not living in la la land(dreamland) where I think Mourinho or any other top class manager would even touch this club with a pitchfork since we are financially ****** and there is just no way there will be money to spend if the managers name is Rafa, Santa Claus or Mourinho.
And if/when City gets CL football and spend another 100 million this summer it won't matter if Saint Pete waving his magic finger is managing us.
And then we have the fact that it is the owners who appoint the manager....
Top of the list in their book is the managers marketing abilty and not tactical/coaching ability...

Thos 2 facts tells me that we are in deep ****. Klinsmann is still available I hear....

Ben Patrick wrote:But you trust Rafa to spend the 16 million wisely ?

I dont.

Penguins wrote:"Well, Rafa wouldn't spend it well anyway so they shouldn't give him any money"

That is bull**** as that isn't the real issue, which is that the owners isn't investing in the squad. You really think a new manager would get more money just cause he isn't Rafa?

Kharhaz wrote:

Ben Patrick wrote:But you trust Rafa to spend the 16 million wisely ?

I dont.

The problem isnt how rafa spends the money, or the quality he brings in. Its how he treats them. This is his biggest flaw.

His latest Aquilani treatment is a prime example.

He can spot the talent, he just mistreats so many people the club lose out. If you look at the players that could still be here that rafa has signed, and he hasnt done too badly in that area, then compare it to the players we have lost his most obvious flaw is exposed. Simply, if rafa doesnt like there attitude, then off they go.

And its this which says to me rafa is not putting the club first. Just take a look at our squad. Its rafas squad, not Liverpools.

LFC2007 wrote:

Ben Patrick wrote:

andy_g wrote:go


but not as in 'feck of you stupid fat waiter you useless piece of muck you haven't got a bleeding clue'

but as in 'thanks for giving it a decent shot at times, rafa, but i don't think you're the right fella for the job anymore'

Thats exactly where i am mate.

Ditto.

I've gone through the '...serious question marks have to be reaised' phase and by the time I reached a view on the issue I was pretty convinced we had to make a change. Now, if I'm honest, I actually feel eager for a change of manager.

bigmick wrote:Mt opinion has changed. I used to think it would be best for everyone if we got a new manager, I am now absolutely convinced that this manager is a disaster on every level. If we don't like the owners (and we don't) we should get somebody in who isn't a puppet.