Page 2 of 3
Posted:
Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:42 pmby supersub
"Up yours Gerard" says Martin O'Neil,at a recent press conference,in reply to GH's insistence that O'Neil was responsible for Houllier picking the wrong team,playing players out of position and generally making a total pigs ear of Liverpool's reputation.
Posted:
Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:51 pmby chrys
houllier will b there next year n with cisse if u want it or not. n they r going to bring the title back on the mersey.hope all of u got it clear. if u think liverpool need somethin else than houllier n cisse it would b kaka from milan.
Posted:
Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:54 pmby ckay
And Kaka would cost £20million.
It's not that I don't like GH it's just that we turn that many corners that we end up a square one again!!!
Posted:
Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:59 pmby chrys
yep but would a change bring something radical. chelsea is a good example of that. liverpool need more players on the bench to back up first team squad. this is the thing that miss us these last three month.every top team of the league have super sub on the bench n what do we have at liverpool? 
???
Posted:
Wed Mar 24, 2004 6:07 pmby Scottbot
And who do you think is responsible for who we have on the bench?
Posted:
Wed Mar 24, 2004 6:31 pmby Woollyback
It's gotta be O'Neill for me. But whilst Moores is still sitting up in the boardroom burying his head in the sand we've got no chance of getting rid of Houllier. That's why we need someone like Morgan to force the agenda.
Even if Cisse turns out to be magic it's no use if the rest of the team (apart from Stevie G and one or 2 others) are playing like fannies. O'Neill is the man to ruffle some feathers in the dressing room and get everybody playing their hearts out for the right to wear the red shirt.
Posted:
Wed Mar 24, 2004 6:32 pmby zackboxer
Even when we have our first team available we still manage to play sh#te most of the time!
Posted:
Wed Mar 24, 2004 6:37 pmby chrys
certainly not cisse.lol. but if something is to b done it is to get a better sub bench but i dont think sackin houllier would arrange thing as the budget is limited.i must admit that houlliers acquisitions have not yet emerge from the lot n who must go must go.when houllier bought diouf n pal it was a good deal at that time n i've watch them play in the african cup of nation n i can tell u they were impresive now if they dont deliver the goods .......' i have not all the answers but i think houllier should stay. (my opinion)
Posted:
Wed Mar 24, 2004 6:41 pmby chrys
see u all
Posted:
Wed Mar 24, 2004 7:28 pmby Badmao1
Martin O'Neill we need you. Cisse isn't the answer to everything wrong with Liverpool but i think he will score goals. I feel we need another couple of defenders and two midfielders as well.
Posted:
Wed Mar 24, 2004 9:50 pmby supersub
for sure!
Posted:
Thu Mar 25, 2004 12:18 pmby stmichael
our main weaknesses are not upfront. we need a centre half and a right winger before we sign another striker.
Posted:
Thu Mar 25, 2004 7:35 pmby banana
Houllier should not be allowed to spend more money on players. Save every penny for the NEW manager. (Hopefully this summer, M O'Neill)
Posted:
Thu Mar 25, 2004 7:52 pmby manic-red
Too true. Since when was Diouf a right-winger, Heskey a left-winger, Biscan a centre back? He buys players and then plays them out of position. Tactical brain of a monkey with a spanner if you ask me. Still think O'Neil would mean long ball and the non-existence of a creative midfield but he can get the best out of his players. I hope he proves me wrong.
Posted:
Thu Mar 25, 2004 8:53 pmby CeeBee
in the 70's & 80'S we outpassed just about everyone' during the mid 90's we passed just for the sake of it, the single biggest problem now is that we pass to the opposition much more than to our own players. can any manager turn average players into creative genius's