Woodgate...

The Premiership - General Discussion

Postby Stu.Murph » Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:23 pm

Ade wrote:Stu, Carra had a few dodgy games earlier in his career - he even scored two own goals in one game against the Mancs, which might be a record. And the fact that he was shunted around as a utility defender and makeshift defensive midfielder tells you that he needed time to mature. And over the past 3 seasons, given that time and patience, he has been magnificent.

Agger will come good. Drogba has made a mess of a lot of defenders over the past two years, and Dan didn't get the best back-up from his fullbacks on Weds. Him and Carra are fine, it's LB, the wingers and two new strikers we need. You go hunting for a world-class CB with our new American bankrollers and you'll be stumping up nearly £10m for a player we don't need.

Finnan is also top-quality and was badly missed against Chelsea.

He never had dodgy games at all. Thats was peoples completely wrong perception of the lad because he was playing in defence on his own when Liverpool went through the stage of playing a 1-4-2 formation.

Carragher was :censored: immense them first few years and i dread to think how bad our defence would have been without him there. Its not even worth thinking about. Myself and a mate of mine used to say untill he moved back to centre half regularly, how the only players who ever got the better of him were Pires and Henry and he marked players like Giggs, Beckham, Robert, Kewell etc etc out of games consistently.

That game against the Mancs aswell, neither of those own goals were his fault and if one player around him had bothered there :censored: to even attempt to do their job none of those incidents would have happened.

I'd rather the arguement saying the fact he was shunted around shown he was already mature as to the fact he held his own ahead of specialist players like Zeige, Babbel etc etc. He shown his maturity from day one.

As I've said a million times, my opinion of Carragher has never ever changed. I find it laughable how people say he used to be :censored: and now he's great. The fact is he's always been the same and he never shows anything now (except experience) he didn't show in his earlier days.

Simple as that.
Image
User avatar
Stu.Murph
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:32 am
Location: Liverpool

Postby GLB1 » Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:25 pm

Stu.Murph wrote:
stmichael wrote:
Stu.Murph wrote:We've already got Riise and Finnan who aren't top players at the back

behave

I've been over this time and time again. Finnan isn't great going forward. He's very good and clever defensively but going forward he offers little in the way of an overlap. He's another limited player.

His concentration and composure are absoloutely superb as is his reading of the game and unauthordox positioning but he's not and never will be a top class player. The amount of times he simply fails to overlap and create space for the wide players and the amount of times he doesn't get forward when its on is a massive hinderance to our attack and one reason we often look one dimensional.

Alot of people only see players for what they are, when in all reality, you have to look at what they aren't to figure out where to improve.

He's a good player who provides solidity and consistency and is one you can get away with providing the balance of the team around him is right, which it generally is.

How anyone can sit there and say he's a great player though is beyond me.

To be quite honest, listening to everyone here...

Jamie Carragher's world class.
Steven Gerrard's world class.
Xabi Alonso and Mascherano are top class.
Aggers going to be world class as is Sissoko.
Kuyts a great player.
Finnan's the best right back in the league and Gonzalez might become the new Ronaldo because he's lightening quick...

We're just 3rd because we have been unlucky this season then?

Basically we have at least two world class players, two world class prospects and two players who'd get into any team in the league and potentially one of the best wingers in the world in Gonzalez.

:no

The fact is, if it wasn't for Gerrard, Alonso and Carragher, Liverpool FC probably wouldn't be as strong as Everton on paper.

It's always easy to point out the negative aspects of a player and tell everyone "I told you so!"

Sometimes the glass is half full you know.

Is Stu this Dunc guy from Koptalk who just wants to wind people up ?

Gets a bit tiring always reading negative know it all BS

All of our players have negative aspects to their game.. true .. but there is no team in the world that has perfect players in every position. (Unless you think it is football manager) For all these non-class players we seem to have we have done alright this season. We are looking at 3rd place in the league and another CL final. Although not reaching the goal of being the best English team where we belong we are definitely heading in the right direction.

How bout trying to be a supporter for once and not a critic !


Cue Stu:
"What do you know?"
"Another optimist"
" :no "
"blah blah blah"

Reply:

"Cheer up mate, give us a smile"
GLB1
 
Posts: 130
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 6:11 am

Postby dawson99 » Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:28 pm

So if woodgate is 7 million but injury prone, who else of his calibre could we get for the same kind of money?
0118 999 881 999 119 7253
Image
User avatar
dawson99
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 25377
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 12:56 pm
Location: in the mo fo hood y'all

Postby Stu.Murph » Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:32 pm

GLB1 wrote:
Stu.Murph wrote:
stmichael wrote:
Stu.Murph wrote:We've already got Riise and Finnan who aren't top players at the back

behave

I've been over this time and time again. Finnan isn't great going forward. He's very good and clever defensively but going forward he offers little in the way of an overlap. He's another limited player.

His concentration and composure are absoloutely superb as is his reading of the game and unauthordox positioning but he's not and never will be a top class player. The amount of times he simply fails to overlap and create space for the wide players and the amount of times he doesn't get forward when its on is a massive hinderance to our attack and one reason we often look one dimensional.

Alot of people only see players for what they are, when in all reality, you have to look at what they aren't to figure out where to improve.

He's a good player who provides solidity and consistency and is one you can get away with providing the balance of the team around him is right, which it generally is.

How anyone can sit there and say he's a great player though is beyond me.

To be quite honest, listening to everyone here...

Jamie Carragher's world class.
Steven Gerrard's world class.
Xabi Alonso and Mascherano are top class.
Aggers going to be world class as is Sissoko.
Kuyts a great player.
Finnan's the best right back in the league and Gonzalez might become the new Ronaldo because he's lightening quick...

We're just 3rd because we have been unlucky this season then?

Basically we have at least two world class players, two world class prospects and two players who'd get into any team in the league and potentially one of the best wingers in the world in Gonzalez.

:no

The fact is, if it wasn't for Gerrard, Alonso and Carragher, Liverpool FC probably wouldn't be as strong as Everton on paper.

It's always easy to point out the negative aspects of a player and tell everyone "I told you so!"

Sometimes the glass is half full you know.

Is Stu this Dunc guy from Koptalk who just wants to wind people up ?

Gets a bit tiring always reading negative know it all BS

All of our players have negative aspects to their game.. true .. but there is no team in the world that has perfect players in every position. (Unless you think it is football manager) For all these non-class players we seem to have we have done alright this season. We are looking at 3rd place in the league and another CL final. Although not reaching the goal of being the best English team where we belong we are definitely heading in the right direction.

How bout trying to be a supporter for once and not a critic !


Cue Stu:
"What do you know?"
"Another optimist"
" :no "
"blah blah blah"

Reply:

"Cheer up mate, give us a smile"

Being a supporter? You're right I will say what would you know about it?

I spend thousands watching this team and cheering them on and I have every right to point out the fact that finishing third every season and doing "ok" isn't good enough for this club.

Shankley and Paisley would turn in their graves hearing you saying we're doing ok. "We had bad times aswell, one season we finished second". Under Benitez we can't even say that.

I'm sick of the excuses. Its as simple as that.

Give him time, give him this, give him that.

The fact is if Rafa doesn't deliver next season he's going to put himself under serious pressure. Next season will define weather we have the right man for the job, in many ways I think this summer is crucial.
Image
User avatar
Stu.Murph
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:32 am
Location: Liverpool

Postby account deleted by request » Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:53 pm

dawson99 wrote:So if woodgate is 7 million but injury prone, who else of his calibre could we get for the same kind of money?

Probably no-one with his proven ability, experience, quality etc. He was discount price for a reason, he's a gamble because of fitness problems not on his ability.

I still think people are panicking over Agger too much. He struggled against Drogba but he didnt stop trying didn't take the easy way out and get sent off. He got a footballing lesson against Chelsea, but for me he reacted well on the night. We need to see now if he has learned his lesson, and how well he reacts. FFS Drogba ripped Sammi apart when they won 4-1 and has been a handfull for most CB'S all season.

The two areas of Aggers game that need improvement are his heading and his strength. His heading can be improved but he's never going to be another Sammi , his strength will come as he matures. His distribution while not "Hansonesque" as some were saying is still better than most CB'S.

Lets see how he plays the next few games ,as it will tell us almost everything we need to know about his charactor, and my money is on him passing the test.
account deleted by request
 
Posts: 20690
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:11 am

Postby Stu.Murph » Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:58 pm

s@int wrote:
dawson99 wrote:So if woodgate is 7 million but injury prone, who else of his calibre could we get for the same kind of money?

Probably no-one with his proven ability, experience, quality etc. He was discount price for a reason, he's a gamble because of fitness problems not on his ability.

I still think people are panicking over Agger too much. He struggled against Drogba but he didnt stop trying didn't take the easy way out and get sent off. He got a footballing lesson against Chelsea, but for me he reacted well on the night. We need to see now if he has learned his lesson, and how well he reacts. FFS Drogba ripped Sammi apart when they won 4-1 and has been a handfull for most CB'S all season.

The two areas of Aggers game that need improvement are his heading and his strength. His heading can be improved but he's never going to be another Sammi , his strength will come as he matures. His distribution while not "Hansonesque" as some were saying is still better than most CB'S.

Lets see how he plays the next few games ,as it will tell us almost everything we need to know about his charactor, and my money is on him passing the test.

Apart from Hyypia had the flu that game saint, lets not forget that.
Image
User avatar
Stu.Murph
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:32 am
Location: Liverpool

Postby Ade » Fri Apr 27, 2007 4:12 pm

Stu.Murph wrote:
Ade wrote:Stu, Carra had a few dodgy games earlier in his career - he even scored two own goals in one game against the Mancs, which might be a record. And the fact that he was shunted around as a utility defender and makeshift defensive midfielder tells you that he needed time to mature. And over the past 3 seasons, given that time and patience, he has been magnificent.

Agger will come good. Drogba has made a mess of a lot of defenders over the past two years, and Dan didn't get the best back-up from his fullbacks on Weds. Him and Carra are fine, it's LB, the wingers and two new strikers we need. You go hunting for a world-class CB with our new American bankrollers and you'll be stumping up nearly £10m for a player we don't need.

Finnan is also top-quality and was badly missed against Chelsea.

He never had dodgy games at all. Thats was peoples completely wrong perception of the lad because he was playing in defence on his own when Liverpool went through the stage of playing a 1-4-2 formation.

Carragher was :censored: immense them first few years and i dread to think how bad our defence would have been without him there. Its not even worth thinking about. Myself and a mate of mine used to say untill he moved back to centre half regularly, how the only players who ever got the better of him were Pires and Henry and he marked players like Giggs, Beckham, Robert, Kewell etc etc out of games consistently.

That game against the Mancs aswell, neither of those own goals were his fault and if one player around him had bothered there :censored: to even attempt to do their job none of those incidents would have happened.

I'd rather the arguement saying the fact he was shunted around shown he was already mature as to the fact he held his own ahead of specialist players like Zeige, Babbel etc etc. He shown his maturity from day one.

As I've said a million times, my opinion of Carragher has never ever changed. I find it laughable how people say he used to be :censored: and now he's great. The fact is he's always been the same and he never shows anything now (except experience) he didn't show in his earlier days.

Simple as that.

:censored:, he was shaky at times and the idea that it was the fault of everyone around him, all the time, never Carra's fault… do me a favour.

You're gambling on being the first to 'out' a player who's not gonna make it, ie Agger, and yet after years of watching Carragher you can't even recognise that he's made enormous progress, from being a utility player who was up and down in the late Nineties, to being a superb CB today. The idea that he was always top drawer is :censored:.

And what's a 1-4-2 formation? Don't remember that one, but you see more than the rest of us, obviously
Ade
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 292
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:37 pm

Postby account deleted by request » Fri Apr 27, 2007 4:13 pm

Stu.Murph wrote:
s@int wrote:
dawson99 wrote:So if woodgate is 7 million but injury prone, who else of his calibre could we get for the same kind of money?

Probably no-one with his proven ability, experience, quality etc. He was discount price for a reason, he's a gamble because of fitness problems not on his ability.

I still think people are panicking over Agger too much. He struggled against Drogba but he didnt stop trying didn't take the easy way out and get sent off. He got a footballing lesson against Chelsea, but for me he reacted well on the night. We need to see now if he has learned his lesson, and how well he reacts. FFS Drogba ripped Sammi apart when they won 4-1 and has been a handfull for most CB'S all season.

The two areas of Aggers game that need improvement are his heading and his strength. His heading can be improved but he's never going to be another Sammi , his strength will come as he matures. His distribution while not "Hansonesque" as some were saying is still better than most CB'S.

Lets see how he plays the next few games ,as it will tell us almost everything we need to know about his charactor, and my money is on him passing the test.

Apart from Hyypia had the flu that game saint, lets not forget that.

Yeah I knew that mate  :D  Editorial license.

Its just started to irritate me a bit the way people build players up as if they were Pele and after a  bad game or bad patch make out they are Traore.

Reina
Arbeloa
Agger
Kuyt
Sissiko
Crouch
ETC.

They have all been the best thing since sliced bread and then become last months mouldy cheese.
account deleted by request
 
Posts: 20690
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:11 am

Postby The Specialist » Fri Apr 27, 2007 4:25 pm

Stu.Murph wrote:
Fowler_E7 wrote:
Stu.Murph wrote:the other question I suppose I should have asked, if not Woodgate who?

i cant think of any obvious names that spring to mind, but i wouldnt mind a centre back with some good experience (around 28/29) being signed to come in to add to the competion for places. Also someone of that age would be good to step in for when Agger loses form. Agger is still only 22 and will have a few more terrible games like he did the other night before he is a top class central defender, BUT i believe he will come good and be as consistent as the other top Defenders in the league.

Not a cat in hells chance.

He's not good enough and that performance the other night shown exactly what I've been saying about the lad all season. If he's singled out and attacked by a good player he'll struggle because he's not upto it. Thats exactly what happened.

People will say its only one bad game, but the point is with players like Carragher, Alonso and Gerrard that that simply does not happen to them.

Carragher. Game against Arsenal earlier in the season. Thierry Henry. That was a bigger f*ck-up than Agger's..
The Specialist
 
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:44 pm

Postby Stu.Murph » Fri Apr 27, 2007 4:30 pm

Ade wrote:
Stu.Murph wrote:
Ade wrote:Stu, Carra had a few dodgy games earlier in his career - he even scored two own goals in one game against the Mancs, which might be a record. And the fact that he was shunted around as a utility defender and makeshift defensive midfielder tells you that he needed time to mature. And over the past 3 seasons, given that time and patience, he has been magnificent.

Agger will come good. Drogba has made a mess of a lot of defenders over the past two years, and Dan didn't get the best back-up from his fullbacks on Weds. Him and Carra are fine, it's LB, the wingers and two new strikers we need. You go hunting for a world-class CB with our new American bankrollers and you'll be stumping up nearly £10m for a player we don't need.

Finnan is also top-quality and was badly missed against Chelsea.

He never had dodgy games at all. Thats was peoples completely wrong perception of the lad because he was playing in defence on his own when Liverpool went through the stage of playing a 1-4-2 formation.

Carragher was :censored: immense them first few years and i dread to think how bad our defence would have been without him there. Its not even worth thinking about. Myself and a mate of mine used to say untill he moved back to centre half regularly, how the only players who ever got the better of him were Pires and Henry and he marked players like Giggs, Beckham, Robert, Kewell etc etc out of games consistently.

That game against the Mancs aswell, neither of those own goals were his fault and if one player around him had bothered there :censored: to even attempt to do their job none of those incidents would have happened.

I'd rather the arguement saying the fact he was shunted around shown he was already mature as to the fact he held his own ahead of specialist players like Zeige, Babbel etc etc. He shown his maturity from day one.

As I've said a million times, my opinion of Carragher has never ever changed. I find it laughable how people say he used to be :censored: and now he's great. The fact is he's always been the same and he never shows anything now (except experience) he didn't show in his earlier days.

Simple as that.

:censored:, he was shaky at times and the idea that it was the fault of everyone around him, all the time, never Carra's fault… do me a favour.

You're gambling on being the first to 'out' a player who's not gonna make it, ie Agger, and yet after years of watching Carragher you can't even recognise that he's made enormous progress, from being a utility player who was up and down in the late Nineties, to being a superb CB today. The idea that he was always top drawer is :censored:.

And what's a 1-4-2 formation? Don't remember that one, but you see more than the rest of us, obviously

What utter and absoloute childish rubbish you are prattling about something you clearly know absoloutely nothing about. Give me examples of when he was "shaky" because I for one Certainly didn't see it. I remember him playing at full back and struggling to overlap, I also remember a lack of technical ability hindering our attack, but I never once remember a mistake against other players than Pires or Henry. That includes Giggs, Beckham, Kewell, Duff, Robert, Overmars and just about any other winger you'd care to mention.

I tell you what, lets put any 18 year old at the back with McAteer, Kvarme, Babb and Matteo and see how they fair. Infact, lets put Woodgate, Ferdinand etc in there or any other class centre half.

The fact is they would all struggle with players of that calibre around them and you're coming on here telling me an 18 year old centre back was "shaky"? Do me a favour!

Jamie Carragher when he first came through was excellent and completely failed to get the recognition he deserved due to idiots like yourself.

Players don't ever become something they are not. They never learn to be a different player or gain attributes they never had.

From day one Jamie Carraghers been about passion, commitment, solid defending and ability to read the game and snuff out danger. He's exactly the same player now but with a bit more confidence and experience.

End of discussion.
Image
User avatar
Stu.Murph
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:32 am
Location: Liverpool

Postby The Specialist » Fri Apr 27, 2007 4:30 pm

Bad Bob wrote:
dawson99 wrote:Alonso never had a bad bad game? i take it you were watching a different game this week?

Well, I guess I was watching a different game too as I thought Alonso was solid.  Would all those who feel Alonso had a shocker care to provide some evidence to support this conclusion?  Just what did he do that was so poor?  ???

He was shi.te, get over it.

Look at the rash tackles, all the stray passes. He was incredibly lucky he didn't get sent off.
The Specialist
 
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:44 pm

Postby Ade » Fri Apr 27, 2007 4:51 pm

Stu.Murph wrote:
Ade wrote:
Stu.Murph wrote:
Ade wrote:Stu, Carra had a few dodgy games earlier in his career - he even scored two own goals in one game against the Mancs, which might be a record. And the fact that he was shunted around as a utility defender and makeshift defensive midfielder tells you that he needed time to mature. And over the past 3 seasons, given that time and patience, he has been magnificent.

Agger will come good. Drogba has made a mess of a lot of defenders over the past two years, and Dan didn't get the best back-up from his fullbacks on Weds. Him and Carra are fine, it's LB, the wingers and two new strikers we need. You go hunting for a world-class CB with our new American bankrollers and you'll be stumping up nearly £10m for a player we don't need.

Finnan is also top-quality and was badly missed against Chelsea.

He never had dodgy games at all. Thats was peoples completely wrong perception of the lad because he was playing in defence on his own when Liverpool went through the stage of playing a 1-4-2 formation.

Carragher was :censored: immense them first few years and i dread to think how bad our defence would have been without him there. Its not even worth thinking about. Myself and a mate of mine used to say untill he moved back to centre half regularly, how the only players who ever got the better of him were Pires and Henry and he marked players like Giggs, Beckham, Robert, Kewell etc etc out of games consistently.

That game against the Mancs aswell, neither of those own goals were his fault and if one player around him had bothered there :censored: to even attempt to do their job none of those incidents would have happened.

I'd rather the arguement saying the fact he was shunted around shown he was already mature as to the fact he held his own ahead of specialist players like Zeige, Babbel etc etc. He shown his maturity from day one.

As I've said a million times, my opinion of Carragher has never ever changed. I find it laughable how people say he used to be :censored: and now he's great. The fact is he's always been the same and he never shows anything now (except experience) he didn't show in his earlier days.

Simple as that.

:censored:, he was shaky at times and the idea that it was the fault of everyone around him, all the time, never Carra's fault… do me a favour.

You're gambling on being the first to 'out' a player who's not gonna make it, ie Agger, and yet after years of watching Carragher you can't even recognise that he's made enormous progress, from being a utility player who was up and down in the late Nineties, to being a superb CB today. The idea that he was always top drawer is :censored:.

And what's a 1-4-2 formation? Don't remember that one, but you see more than the rest of us, obviously

What utter and absoloute childish rubbish you are prattling about something you clearly know absoloutely nothing about. Give me examples of when he was "shaky" because I for one Certainly didn't see it. I remember him playing at full back and struggling to overlap, I also remember a lack of technical ability hindering our attack, but I never once remember a mistake against other players than Pires or Henry. That includes Giggs, Beckham, Kewell, Duff, Robert, Overmars and just about any other winger you'd care to mention.

I tell you what, lets put any 18 year old at the back with McAteer, Kvarme, Babb and Matteo and see how they fair. Infact, lets put Woodgate, Ferdinand etc in there or any other class centre half.

The fact is they would all struggle with players of that calibre around them and you're coming on here telling me an 18 year old centre back was "shaky"? Do me a favour!

Jamie Carragher when he first came through was excellent and completely failed to get the recognition he deserved due to idiots like yourself.

Players don't ever become something they are not. They never learn to be a different player or gain attributes they never had.

From day one Jamie Carraghers been about passion, commitment, solid defending and ability to read the game and snuff out danger. He's exactly the same player now but with a bit more confidence and experience.

End of discussion.

Stu, your argument's so full of holes i dunno where to start. Let's just take one, and leave it at that.

'Players never gain attributes they never had.'

Tell that to Rinus Michels and the other Dutch coaches who spent years clearly wasting their time inventing total football.

And as for the 'idiots like you' stuff, try and hold an argument with someone without resorting to abuse and hissy fits. You're only showing yourself up. 

BTW, you are the fella who was berating those of us on here who during the last days of Houllier's reign were calling for the board to replace him with a better manager? Yep, you were right there an all…
Ade
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 292
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:37 pm

Postby Bad Bob » Fri Apr 27, 2007 6:52 pm

The Specialist wrote:
Bad Bob wrote:
dawson99 wrote:Alonso never had a bad bad game? i take it you were watching a different game this week?

Well, I guess I was watching a different game too as I thought Alonso was solid.  Would all those who feel Alonso had a shocker care to provide some evidence to support this conclusion?  Just what did he do that was so poor?  ???

He was shi.te, get over it.

Look at the rash tackles, all the stray passes. He was incredibly lucky he didn't get sent off.

Sh.ite?  Nah, I'm not having that.  Have a look at the performances that Arbeloa, Riise, Bellamy and Zenden put in and Alonso was sh.ite?  Do me a favour.  :no

The only rash challenge I saw was an errant boot into Mikel's thigh on a 50/50 ball.  He apologized straight away, Mikel and Chelsea accepted it (you think Jose wouldn't have made a meal of it if it really was so bad...especially considering the Essien challenge on Hamann last season?) and Merk didn't even give him a talking to.  How was he lucky not to be sent off?  ???  On the other side of the equation, he made so very important tackles in midfield--as always--not to mention a few body-sacrificing slide-ins for the ball when teammates sold him short.  His commitment was total and his contribution was significant.

On the subject of stray passes, I can remember one overcooked pass to Arbeloa but that was more than made up for by the numerous times he reversed play from right to left, finding Zenden in space with a pinpoint pass.  But look, there's always going to be one or two of those "stray" balls from Xabi because, unlike many players attempting cross-field passes, Alonso actually tries to really lead the player by playing the ball into space and inviting them to run onto it, rather than simply trying to pick them out where they stand (or five yards in front of them).  Sometimes, the player gets a late start and doesn't have the legs to get to it but, on the occasions where they come off, those passes usually leave the player in plenty of space deep within the opposition zone.

Now, don't get me wrong, Alonso has certainly had better games in a red shirt but he was far from sh.ite on the night and he was nowhere near our worst performer on the pitch (and was actually much closer to being our top performer).  So, you'll forgive me if I get a little frustrated with people sticking the boot in for no good reason.  :kungfu:
Image
User avatar
Bad Bob
LFC Guru Member
 
Posts: 11269
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:03 pm
Location: Canada

Postby Sabre » Fri Apr 27, 2007 7:09 pm

I still haven't seen the game as I'm preparing a trip this weekend.

But the changes of orientations weren't only numerous, but his anticipations aswell. He stole a lot of balls by being in the correct place. In the second half he got right most of the passes to get out from their pressure. And I can't remember important mistakes in the passing that created danger against us, as for instance Riise at some point with a back pass.

That overcooked pass to arbeloa was in the book of any good player, and if the RB hadn't his mind somewhere else, probably because the shocker he was hading, he would have run for that ball as the gap asked for it.

As for the Mikel tackle, well, I think it was totally intentional. I also think that most of this "messages" are not seen through out the game, and that this is a sport of men, not ladies. Mikel tried to have his lil revenge later BTW. Football. Centre backs deliver messages to strikers, and strikers put their elbow in their centre backs. And most of the times you don't see that in TV. Football.

Just curiosity, did Andy Gray or the tabloids say he had a shócker? that would explain a couple of things.
Image
SOS member #1499

Drummerphil, never forgotten.
User avatar
Sabre
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13178
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:10 am
Location: San Sebastian (Spain)

Postby account deleted by request » Fri Apr 27, 2007 7:14 pm

I thought Alonso had a poor game(not sh.ite on the night :D ) struggled to come to terms with the pace of the game and showed no creativity at all in a game that was crying out for a little imagination. The fact that 3 or 4 players were worse than him doesnt mean he wasn't poor,  he needs to play much better in the second leg or we are in trouble!
Last edited by account deleted by request on Fri Apr 27, 2007 7:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
account deleted by request
 
Posts: 20690
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:11 am

PreviousNext

Return to Premiership - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e