Liverpool FC Forum

by **Sabre** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 1:26 pm

GRAHAM01 wrote:keep going at him judge he will admit it was him that told the mods to close your thread

This is what happened behind the scenes, the full questionary.

Here, here

by **GRAHAM01** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 1:27 pm

Sabre wrote:
GRAHAM01 wrote:keep going at him judge he will admit it was him that told the mods to close your thread

This is what happened behind the scenes, the full questionary.

Here, here

i knew it

by **account deleted by request** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 1:36 pm

FUNNY GUY ?

by **Judge** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 1:50 pm

s@int wrote:FUNNY GUY ?

thats how i'd do it, but with more violence

by **Bad Bob** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 1:54 pm

Judge wrote:its nowt to do whether i posted it or not - the fact is that is was a thread on one whole subject.

You may believe this, Judge, but the distinct impression you give is of someone throwing their toys out of the pram because a thread they started was locked. I seem to recall a lot of :bump

and "post in here you peasants" when Mick started a follow-on thread for the Madrid match discussion. It just feels like you take this stuff way too personally, mate.

by **maypaxvobiscum** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 1:59 pm

Judge is being anal. ban him!

by **Judge** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 1:59 pm

merge them, and practise what your are preaching!!

your cleaning of threads, and the recent activity of merging, and perhaps adjusting the thread title maybe a better option?

makes sense - everything has a reaction to what you or others do on here. i understand how things work etc, and tbh, thats totally fine. But you cannot expect folk not to say somethings, as that is their opinion, whether right or wrong. if you deal with it in a sensitive and sensible way, that is much better - dont you think??

by **Ciggy** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:01 pm

by **Judge** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:02 pm

Ciggy wrote:

by **laza** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:31 pm

Can someone clean this thread up , its looking like a septic tank

Back to the fit birds the only place of sanity left in this ego projected neurotic cesspool nowadays

by **Judge** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:50 pm

laza wrote:Can someone clean this thread up , its looking like a septic tank

Back to the fit birds the only place of sanity left in this ego projected neurotic cesspool nowadays

indeed laza

by **Bad Bob** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:48 pm

Judge wrote:But you cannot expect folk not to say somethings, as that is their opinion, whether right or wrong.

I certainly expect a reaction to every decision I take on here, mate...that's from long experience.

So, no, I didn't expect any different from you. But a reaction that crops up in multiple threads day after day after day? I decided not to comment the first dozen times you brought it up but since you're still reacting, I have to ask: haven't you vented enough?

As for...

if you deal with it in a sensitive and sensible way, that is much better - dont you think??

Forgive, me but I thought this seemed pretty sensitive and sensible:

Sorry Judge but I'm invoking a one-thread per match policy. Too many grumbles last year when we experimented with a single thread for both legs of the tie. I'm going to lock this now and request that we actually focus on the game rather than on the politics of thread making.

An apology, an explanation and a gentle reminder that we didn't really need any more things like:

Judge wrote:a thread not started by bernestein has produced a victory - thanks to me

a great win, so great in fact that we have another thread on it ?

Sorry, mate, but I don't see much wrong with what I've done or how I've handled it.

by **Judge** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:55 pm

you are certainly entitled to your opinion - no probs with that

the one thread match thingy - i had a one match thread - it was locked. no matter how you cloud it - i'd made it quite clear in my original thread it was for the WHOLE of the first round. You changed all that with your comments - heyho we move on

topic of discussion is now over

by **Greavesie** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:02 pm

maypaxvobiscum wrote:Judge loves anal. ban him!

bit harsh that isn't it mate

by **maypaxvobiscum** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:05 pm

Greavesie wrote:
maypaxvobiscum wrote:Judge loves anal. ban him!

bit harsh that isn't it mate

the truth hurts mate

Liverpool FC Forum

Locking and cleaning up threads

Who is online