Liverpool FC Forum

by **dawson99** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:30 pm

Bob, you don;t understand the intuitive, proactive research and development needed for the real world to embrace the ability of infinitely reconfigurable, C2B2B world-class. I washed my hands in muddy water and performed the barefoot ballad of the ubiquitous synopsis of the ambiguous zonal preference

by **Bad Bob** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:43 pm

Au contraire, Dawson, I understand all too well the staid, hackneyed vicissitudes of today's result-based, excessively-leveraged, overly-anodine, crypto-capitalist market configuration. What needs emphasizing, however, is that it's no matter if you're born, to play the king or pawn, for the line is thinly drawn between joy and sorrow. A home truth we can all stand to reflect on in the coming weeks and months, I should think. :nod

by **dawson99** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:46 pm

Bad Bob wrote:Au contraire, Dawson, I understand all too well the staid, hackneyed vicissitudes of today's result-based, excessively-leveraged, overly-anodine, crypto-capitalist market configuration. What needs emphasizing, however, is that it's no matter if you're born, to play the king or pawn, for the line is thinly drawn between joy and sorrow. A home truth we can all stand to reflect on in the coming weeks and months, I should think.

by **taff** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:49 pm

Listen you geeks hand over your dinner money :angry:

by **woof woof !** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:02 pm

taff wrote:Listen you geeks hand over your dinner money

The capability to exploit perfectly demonstrated. We will reinvent the term "Mug" to the more acceptable "customer-directed action". It may seem estranging, but it's true! The capacity to harness dynamically leads to the capacity to revolutionize iteravely. It seems unclear, but it's accurate! We can apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our user community but our capacity to streamline and drain it.

:pirate

by **dawson99** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:04 pm

Plus, A geek's functionality is second to none, and our B2B2C, global, e-business supply-chains and non-complex use is always considered an amazing achievement. Imagine a combination of Python and IIS. All shook up now eh?

by **andy_g** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:06 pm

woof woof ! wrote:We think that most world-class, 24/7 web applications use far too much OWL

The systematic placement of owls is disputed. For example, the Sibley-Ahlquist taxonomy finds that, based on DNA-DNA hybridization, owls are more closely related to the nightjars and their allies (Caprimulgiformes) than to the diurnal predators in the order Falconiformes; consequently, the Caprimulgiformes are placed in the Strigiformes, and the owls in general become a family Strigidae. This is not supported by more recent research. In any case, the relationships of the Caprimulgiformes, the falcons and the accipitrid raptors are not resolved to satisfaction; currently there is an increasing trend to consider each group (with the possible exception of the accipitrids) a distinct order.

by **Bad Bob** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:11 pm

Taff's philippic may appear simple, even desultory to some, but embedded within is a profound wisdom that transcends the ages and sheds new light on the most vexing issue of our time: namely the unyielding obsession our society unflinchingly propagates with respect to our fiduciary well-being. Geeks though we may be, it fails to controvert the fact that specie, as the jejune expression would have it, 'makes the world go round'. I, for one, demure in the face of this colossal truism. :lookaround

by **andy_g** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:16 pm

i disagree, bob

as is evident upon close examination, there can be no doubt that, insomuch as our understanding relies on the statement, the statement can not take account of, on the contrary, the paralogisms, and necessity is just as necessary as the objects in space and time. The statement, in respect of the intelligible character, can never, as a whole, furnish a true and demonstrated science, because, like the ideal of human reason, they exclude the possibility of a posteriori principles, yet the antinomies are the clue to the discovery of, in particular, the antinomies. what we have alone been able to show is that our understanding can not take account of our understanding; on the other hand, our sense perceptions are the mere results of the power of our a posteriori knowledge, a blind but indispensable function of the soul.

by **woof woof !** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:29 pm

Do you have a strategy to become disturbed ? Real World has refactored the abstraction of structuring. It may seem remarkable, but it's true! If all of this sounds confounding to you, that's because it is! We will multiply our ability to disintermediate without devaluing our capability to envisioneer. We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our compliance but our aptitude to implement even larger heating devices, including if need be the burning of Owls.

by **Bad Bob** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:40 pm

andy_g wrote:i disagree, bob

as is evident upon close examination, there can be no doubt that, insomuch as our understanding relies on the statement, the statement can not take account of, on the contrary, the paralogisms, and necessity is just as necessary as the objects in space and time. The statement, in respect of the intelligible character, can never, as a whole, furnish a true and demonstrated science, because, like the ideal of human reason, they exclude the possibility of a posteriori principles, yet the antinomies are the clue to the discovery of, in particular, the antinomies. what we have alone been able to show is that our understanding can not take account of our understanding; on the other hand, our sense perceptions are the mere results of the power of our a posteriori knowledge, a blind but indispensable function of the soul.

You talk a lot of sense here, Andy, but I wonder, in this instance, whether you've shown a little too much affinity for the Gluckenstein syllogism? Surely the apotheosis of a posteriori alterity was surpassed with some acuity in the past nano-fortnight by the paradigm-shifting profundity of Piznicki's patterned analysis of endogenous entropy? To quote from the man himself: "From the moment of my birth to the instant of my death, there are patterns I must follow just as I must breathe each breath. Like a rat in a maze the path before me lies, and the pattern never alters
until the rat dies." Sobering words, but their resonance reverberates regardless. :nod

by **andy_g** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:00 pm

hhhmmmm.... interesting.

but to move the discussion forward i feel we need to ask ourselves how Piznicki would have appraised the problem of the burning of owls vis a vis the emirical necessity by which our cognitive faculties, our ideas and our faculties are connected together?

the fact is evident, even apodictically evident, that we have the reflection that the phenomenological epoche is given continuously as an objective unity in a multi-form and changeable multiplicity of experiences, which belong determinately to it. reason is the key to understanding the employment of our judgements - with the sole exception of the transcendental unity of apperception, our ampliative judgements are just as necessary as our ideas. the never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions, insomuch as the ideal of owl burning relies on natural causes, is abstract from all content of a posteriori knowledge.

by **Bad Bob** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:12 pm

Unfortunately, oh learned Andrew of G, your Quixotic deployment of the 'infinite regress' postulate will not avail you on this occasion--burdened as we are by the quantum mechanics governing this unique place-moment of space-time. Were we to hypothetically bracket off the extraneous discursive encumbrances that foreclose what is possible and what is not possible to interdict on the subject, and were we to eschew the conventional and all too limiting parameters currently constraining the speech-forms of the actants in question (namely, ourselves), it might be possible to initiate an interrogative exchange that begins to approximate the infinite regress you so optimistically cry out for. Until such transcendence is achieved, however, I can only suggest that this dangling conversation, with its superficial sighs, marks the borders of our lives.

by **woof woof !** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:25 pm

Real World practically invented the term " dangling conversation". It may seem alarming, but it's entirely 100% accurate, apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our supply-chains but our ability to nod off or "power nap" . Andy's dismissal of the burning owl fallback position suggests he has an alternative strategy but unproven method for managing unplanned-for turn-key implementation.

by **andy_g** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:34 pm

get a clue! the fact is that noematic descriptions are infinite ideas, related to infinities of harmoniously combinable cogitationes. the ideal of human reason, on the contrary, exists in the objects in space and time. the fact is evident that multiplicities of the phenomenological epoche, as a matter of essential necessity, denote the universal primal phenomena of separated modes of consciousness. our faculties, and we can deduce that this is the case, are the clue to the discovery of the objects in space and time. as is evident upon close examination, the architectonic of pure reason is what first gives rise to the objects in space and time. owls do not construct nests but rather look for a sheltered nesting site or an abandoned nest, in trees, underground burrows, or in buildings, barns and caves.

Liverpool FC Forum

The Real World - The Dog and Gorilla

Who is online