Liverpool FC Forum

by **Reg** » Sat May 31, 2008 1:45 am

Bookmakers reacted incredulously to allegations yesterday that a senior England footballer had racked up gambling losses of around £1million and was refusing to settle the debt. The player, a household name, is alleged to have gambled the sum on horse racing and football matches and to have rebuffed repeated approaches from a betting firm to pay the money owed.

No bookmaker would speak publicly about the alleged debts, but a spokesman for one high-street firm said: “Any bookmaker who allows someone to owe them a million quid deserves to go out of business.”

Another company representative said: “Any responsible bookmaker should not allow a customer to rack up that level of credit.”

There have been numerous allegations in the past of England players betting heavily, culminating in Michael Owen's admission, in 2003, that he had lost in the region of £40,000 gambling on horses. But betting sources said the player alleged to have lost £1million is not Owen, but anotherinternational colleague with a well-documented history of gambling.

He is alleged to have lost the money on matches in the Barclays Premier League and the Champions League. The bookmaker in question is also reported to be pursuing a top European midfield player who plays for a high-flying Premier League club and owes in the region of £100,000. Leading footballers, who have disposable incomes far greater than any normal punter, are prized customers for the betting firms. Ladbrokes revealed in its latest annual report that it had increased profits from its “High Roller” customers from £10.2million in 2006 to £179million in 2007.

In the past, gambling debts were not enforceable in law, but the Gambling Act 2005, which came into force last year, gives bookmakers the right to pursue customers through the courts. An FA spokesman, speaking from the England squad's training base in Trinidad, said the issue had not been brought to the FA's attention and that unless it concerned betting on football matches in which the player was involved, it would be a personal matter.

One football agent, who represents a player rumoured to owe £1million, angrily denied the claims and threatened to sue any newspaper who named his client.

by **Number 9** » Sat May 31, 2008 1:58 am

And?
Considering the fact they earn about £6m a year...no real need is there??

by **jonnymac1979** » Sat May 31, 2008 2:09 am

First players I thought of after reading that, Michael Owen and Wayne Rooney.

by **Buckydiamond** » Sat May 31, 2008 9:51 am

Is this real that Chelsea needs Torres and prepare to Buy him for next reason?

by **account deleted by request** » Sat May 31, 2008 1:02 pm

jonnymac1979 wrote:First players I thought of after reading that, Michael Owen and Wayne Rooney.

First name I thought of was Owen , till you mentioned Rooney. Wasn't Rooney in all the papers a while ago for none payment of gambling debts?

by **Number 9** » Sat May 31, 2008 3:03 pm

Wayne Bridge!

by **Reg** » Sat May 31, 2008 4:07 pm

Number 9 wrote:And?
Considering the fact they earn about £6m a year...no real need is there??

No need for what, I dont get your point?

Anyone who runs up 1 million quids worth of loses is a liability to his club and presents an immediate conflict of interest.

Would also imagine being fairly simple kind of guys, it would also affect his game. I would write it into their contracts they are not allowed to gamble.

Liverpool FC Forum

England footballer's £1million gambling debt - Err......... ?

Who is online