Ciggy wrote:got this from another site
Tonight’s Supporters Meeting – Some VERY interesting news
Tommorrow after the game there will be a demo fans will stay behind chanting anti-H & G sentiments, leaflets will be in circulation to abandon the club shop.
Well, I attended the meeting tonight at the Sandon in Anfield for which there was an excellent turnout of >200 activists and committed Kopites, even The Urchins (our firm for those who don;t know) were well represented (and vocal). I had been invited anyway but at Matt’s request I kinda represented TIA there.
Some very very interesting information came out of this which believe me – you will be DISGUSTED at and if you’re not against Hicks and Gillette already then you will be...just read on.
Background
The meeting followed a secret meeting earlier in town regarding the Share Liverpool proposition.
Most of the fansites, fanzines and supporters groups were represented including us, RAWK, The Urchins, RTK, Liverpool Supporters Network etc. and a VERY important / interesting guest which I will come onto shortly. Notable in their absence were the official supporters club (surprise surprise – scared of banning orders as are many ‘normal’ fans I think) and indeed anyone from Share Liverpool.
The agenda was:
1. Aims & introductions
2. Refinancing package – proper expert explanation of / scrutiny
3. Views from the various supporters clubs / groups
4. Q & A to the floor / general opinion
5. Actions
Whatever you think of Rafa, there’s a lot of combining of issues at the moment which is a basic case of divide and rule by the Yanks. The problems with results, Rafa, whatever, are a SIDE ISSUE at the moment and it is not Rafa vs The Americans it is the fans vs The Americans. Let’s not confuse the issues with our ownership with the issues we may have with Rafa and the team. Lets demonstrate but equally, let’s support our players, through the wind, through the rain.
The Rest of The Meeting
I’ve summed the rest of the meeting up into one section because to be honest, in my opinion, there was a lot of passionate support from committed activists at the meeting but quite a poor framework running the show. There were a lot of soundbites and a lot of ‘we need to organise unions and collect dues’ but little in the way of solid actions. That was billed but it became a bit too committe-ish for me and after people starting rambling about pet issues that had nothing to do with the matters in hand, I felt it descended into a mess. The right people were there, the time was right, people were up for it but I think the people chairing it were not up for the task in my opinion, I would have liked to have seen them take control of things early on, suggest actions and drive them forward instead of basically letting every man and his dog have a say about everything they feel is wrong with Liverpool and trying to be all things to all people. We need leadership.
To be fair, if it was a meeting to decide long term goals and aspirations then yes some really good ideas came out of it and colours were nailed to the mast. Some good suggestions were made and I'm confident everything was noted down by the people chairing it. A separate issue perhaps but everyone uttterly pretty fed up with the fans who turn up at the match, spend 90 mins takin photos on their phone and tellin their mates in London on the phone that they’re in Liverpool at Anfield. It’s this type of ‘support’ from daytrippers that we all know is affecting larger campaigns of this nature.
What did come across well was a simple statement that the Americans can buy the stadium etc but they cannot buy the spirit of this club and we are that spirit.
Having been there 2 hours already, I left the meeting after some woman had rambled on about a non related issue for about 10 mins but I will get anything good that came out of it afterwards from the other people I knew there tomorrow including any specific actions they managed to agree for the weekends match.
As I said, the best part of the meeting was hearing what this journalist – who most reds in Liverpool know and respect – had to say about the inner goings on at the moment. The bottom line is Hicks is shafting us, DIC are still very much at the negotiating table, Moores and Parry may have fcuked up but they know it and are trying to fix things and that the fans not supporting the demonstrations on Saturday have hurt the club by making Hicks complacent and making him take a tougher negotiating line with DIC.
We must keep up the pressure, we must tell everyone who will listen that G&H are evil and need to go and we must keep demonstrating be it at the ground or by not buying any LFC products / merchandise.
This was obviously off the top of my head having just come in from this now so I’m sure I’ve forgotten loads of good stuff, any questions or thoughts please let me know
nobybob wrote:this post has been heavily edited from earlier __specifically all the detail of this journalist and what he said the secret emails to G&H etc WHY IS THIS?
Ciggy wrote:nobybob wrote:this post has been heavily edited from earlier __specifically all the detail of this journalist and what he said the secret emails to G&H etc WHY IS THIS?
Because it will jeopodise the journo's future everyone knows who he is anyway.
nobybob wrote:lakes10 wrote:the word "activists" put me off having anything to do with them.
I would describe you as an activist -in the rafa out brigade
lakes10 wrote:nobybob wrote:lakes10 wrote:the word "activists" put me off having anything to do with them.
I would describe you as an activist -in the rafa out brigade
"activists"
from writing letters to newspapers or politicians, political campaigning, economic activism (such as boycotts or preferentially patronizing preferred businesses), rallies and street marches, strikes, or even guerrilla tactics. In the more confrontational cases, an activist may be called a freedom fighter by some, and a terrorist by others, depending on whether the commentator supports the activist's ends.
I have done none of the above.
s@int wrote:lakes10 wrote:nobybob wrote:lakes10 wrote:the word "activists" put me off having anything to do with them.
I would describe you as an activist -in the rafa out brigade
"activists"
from writing letters to newspapers or politicians, political campaigning, economic activism (such as boycotts or preferentially patronizing preferred businesses), rallies and street marches, strikes, or even guerrilla tactics. In the more confrontational cases, an activist may be called a freedom fighter by some, and a terrorist by others, depending on whether the commentator supports the activist's ends.
I have done none of the above.
slacker
nobybob wrote:Ciggy wrote:nobybob wrote:this post has been heavily edited from earlier __specifically all the detail of this journalist and what he said the secret emails to G&H etc WHY IS THIS?
Because it will jeopodise the journo's future everyone knows who he is anyway.
it was not his identity i was interested in it was was he said and secret emails ect they were the important bit
heimdall wrote:Yes don't be a tease Ciggy, give us the info please
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Feedfetcher and 22 guests