Newkit law - Madder than saudi arabia ?

Please post your Non football related Polls in this forum

Newkit law - Madder than saudi arabia ?

1, Life imprisonment + Castration
1
8%
2, Life imprisonment
0
No votes
3, Ten years + Castration
1
8%
4, Ten years
0
No votes
5, Five years + Castration
0
No votes
6, Five years
0
No votes
7, Hand culprits over to victims family
6
46%
8, Hang culprits by their gonads in public square
1
8%
9, Option 8 + arm public with dildo's
2
15%
10, Other
2
15%
 
Total votes : 13

Postby woof woof ! » Sat Nov 17, 2007 10:52 am

An appeal court in Saudi Arabia has doubled the number of lashes and added a jail sentence as punishment for a woman who was gang-raped.

The victim was initially punished for violating laws on segregation of the sexes - she was in an unrelated man's car at the time of the attack.

When she appealed, the judges said she had been attempting to use the media to influence them.

The attackers' sentences - originally of up to five years - were doubled.

Extra penalties

According to the Arab News newspaper, the 19-year-old woman, who is from Saudi Arabia's Shia minority, was gang-raped 14 times in an attack in the eastern province a year-and-a-half ago.

Seven men from the majority Sunni community were found guilty of the rape and sentenced to prison terms ranging from just under a year to five years.

But the victim was also punished for violating Saudi Arabia's laws on segregation that forbid unrelated men and women from associating with each other. She was initially sentenced to 90 lashes for being in the car of a strange man.

On appeal, the Arab News reported that the punishment was not reduced but increased to 200 lashes and a six-month prison sentence.

The rapists also had their prison terms doubled. But the sentences are still low considering they could have faced the death penalty.

The Arab News quoted an official as saying the judges had decided to punish the girl for trying to aggravate and influence the judiciary through the media.

The victim's lawyer was suspended from the case, has had his licence to work confiscated, and faces a disciplinary session.





Following up on Dawsinos thread in Gen chat, if you had the power to serve sentence on condemend gang rapists what punishment would you recommend ? I'm stuck between choosing option 3 and 9.


:nod
Image

Image
User avatar
woof woof !
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 21173
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:22 am
Location: Here There and Everywhere

Postby NANNY RED » Sat Nov 17, 2007 11:11 am

I  was actually stuck between 7 and 8 but i went for 7
Ive got a 21 year old daughter just put it this way id want to get hold of the :censored: myself after 10 minutes thed be screaming for me to put them out there miserable little scubbag lives
HE WHO BETRAYS WILL ALWAYS WALK ALONE
User avatar
NANNY RED
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13334
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 12:45 pm

Postby account deleted by request » Sat Nov 17, 2007 11:24 am

Option seven for me too
account deleted by request
 
Posts: 20690
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:11 am

Postby dawson99 » Sat Nov 17, 2007 12:48 pm

every punishment should be 7.

tie them up, let the family dish out whatever punishment they see fit, or if they dont wanna, they can use special people to do whatever they want. a bit of castration, dismemberment, death, that kind of thing would do nicely
0118 999 881 999 119 7253
Image
User avatar
dawson99
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 25377
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 12:56 pm
Location: in the mo fo hood y'all

Postby Sabre » Sat Nov 17, 2007 2:46 pm

Seven, and once finnished, Eight.
Image
SOS member #1499

Drummerphil, never forgotten.
User avatar
Sabre
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13178
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:10 am
Location: San Sebastian (Spain)

Postby Dundalk » Sat Nov 17, 2007 6:41 pm

7 all day long!

Uncles and everything allowed to join in!!
User avatar
Dundalk
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 14767
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 9:46 am
Location: Dundalk

Postby LFC2007 » Sat Nov 17, 2007 9:54 pm

I don't understand how and why the victim was punished for attempting to influence the judiciary through the media?

Strange.

Anyway, option 7 then option 2.
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

Postby RUSHIE#9 » Sun Nov 18, 2007 1:16 am

I've gone for option 3 but would like to add a touch of options 7&8 to it. Allow the family to do the castrating in a public square!

Has a nice justification to it!
User avatar
RUSHIE#9
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 3694
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 7:25 pm

Postby Judge » Mon Nov 19, 2007 11:29 am

option 9, with option 7 being an option also

cack english, but you get my meaning :D
Image
User avatar
Judge
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 20477
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 11:21 am

Postby ConnO'var » Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:45 pm

Death...... slowly..... over flaming coals....

Unforgiveable crime.
Image
Image
User avatar
ConnO'var
 
Posts: 3643
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 2:30 pm

Postby Sabre » Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:56 pm

I don't know why option 8 is so ignored. Surely it's important to provide some justice by number 7, but setting an example to avoid future incidents is also important.

I think both in your country and mine were put heads on sticks for this purpose :D I know, a long time ago :D
Image
SOS member #1499

Drummerphil, never forgotten.
User avatar
Sabre
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13178
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:10 am
Location: San Sebastian (Spain)

Postby Mikz » Mon Nov 19, 2007 4:41 pm

7 is no good...what if the victims family are all oaps

8 all day long brother
'' Gary lineker may well have scored 5 goals in 5 minutes , but i think you have to say, what else did he do '' ...Jimmy Hill
User avatar
Mikz
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 3233
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:35 pm
Location: Belfast


Return to Non Football Related Polls

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests