Liverpool FC Forum

by **account deleted by request** » Fri May 04, 2007 2:15 pm

Just noticed Well_ Red (alias Barrybelfast) has been banned, what did he do this time?

by **Sabre** » Fri May 04, 2007 2:32 pm

I guess the answer is in your question.

As you say, Well_Red is Barry Belfast. And Barry Belfast was banned last week in a thread that was locked.

Since Barry Belfast is banned, Well Red was banned by a mod (not sure who, could be any) who banned him as soon as he was sure he was him.

No attempts from Barry to stay in the forum, nor to apologise for the behaviour of that closed thread, so I guess that means it's true he's not bothered to write in this forum again.

Hope that's answered your question.

by **112-1077774096** » Fri May 04, 2007 2:33 pm

oh, so a banned member was banned again, i wonder when that mod will get demoted for banning an already banned member, i seem to remember you saying i was wrong in banning stu, but know you are saying this is right when its exactly the same as what i did

:no

by **Judge** » Fri May 04, 2007 2:41 pm

i want his fucking job

by **Roger Red Hat** » Fri May 04, 2007 2:50 pm

hang him!

by **Sabre** » Fri May 04, 2007 3:01 pm

i seem to remember you saying i was wrong in banning stu, but know you are saying this is right when its exactly the same as what i did

No. Refresh your memory.

I didn't say it was wrong publicly, as I don't argue other mod's decissions.

And privately, I raised a question: whether we were going to consider his coming back, or not. You had the last decission, and you decided not to. We backed you.

And it was not the same thing. Stu was allowed back because we all agreed to it. And we agreed with the condition to control his behaviour with cards. Which unfortunately, can be interpreted in distinct ways.

So it wasn't exactly the same situation.

You all have available the PMs if you want to clarify this situations. You preffer to make it public for some reason, and you've the right to do so. But if you state facts that are not true or are misleading, we have the right also to give our point of view.

by **account deleted by request** » Fri May 04, 2007 3:02 pm

No attempts from Barry to stay in the forum

Thanks for the reply which is fair enough for me, if you ignore peewee's point about banned members. I'm not quite sure what you meant by the above quote though?

by **Sabre** » Fri May 04, 2007 3:04 pm

s@int wrote:
No attempts from Barry to stay in the forum

Thanks for the reply which is fair enough for me, if you ignore peewee's point about banned members. I'm not quite sure what you meant by the above quote though?

I simply mean that the last thing he said in that locked thread is that he wasn't willing to post here any more -among other things- and the mods haven't received any request from Barry or Well Red stating that he has changed his mind (as far as I can tell). That's all.

by **112-1077774096** » Fri May 04, 2007 3:05 pm

sabre stop being a :censored:

, you said i was wrong banning stu and we all didnt agree to him coming back, i didnt agree. you siad you would have handled it differently and not banned him, dont even try and deny that.

now you are again showing your two faced behaviour, you say it was ok for stu to come back but its not ok for barry, i dont remember stu apologising.

there is no point you arguing on this one, you have just shown double standards and again you try and make an excuse, i am going to start calling you jose, reading your posts are like listening to his inteviews

by **Sabre** » Fri May 04, 2007 3:08 pm

*sigh*

Have a good afternoon.

by **112-1077774096** » Fri May 04, 2007 3:10 pm

yeah just give up, dont make yourself look ridiculous again

double standards sabre, hoewever you want to dress it up, in fact why even bother posting in here, surely the mod who banned him should have commented as it seems you were clueless about the reason, but again you have to get involved in something you seem to know nothing about

by **dawson99** » Fri May 04, 2007 3:13 pm

sham of a mockey of a mockery rolled around a sham inside a mockery.

now no arguing, unless a new thread is started, which keeps things calm

by **112-1077774096** » Fri May 04, 2007 3:16 pm

i think it deserves 4 mockeries instead of the paltry 3 you have given

by **account deleted by request** » Fri May 04, 2007 3:37 pm

I was just wondering if I had missed a good arguement, I wasn't trying to start World War 3

So if Barry asks to come back he can ?

by **dawson99** » Fri May 04, 2007 3:40 pm

yeah course he can, everyone can come back!!!

yay yay yay

Liverpool FC Forum

What did barry do this time? - Well_red banned?

Who is online