Sabre wrote:Well I'm in a situation I haven't been before. There was a job-partner that used to cause some trouble at my work. He was one of those who wanted to ascend quickly no matter who had to brush aside to do it, no matter the methods. He was ready to leave you in a bad position in order he got the credit. (1)
Thus the people at work didn't like him. He eventually left because he was offered a better job, but apparently was sacked twice after that.
Now a an enterprise has called us to ask for him and I have to give an answer. I haven't done such a thing before and I have doubts. Should I be honest and tell to the enterprise not to sign up that worker? Should I just be "ambiguous and neutral"?
After all he won't cause troubles at my work again, and perhaps he did learn a couple of lessons (he's 30, still young).
That's the question, a twát can change? or a twát is a twát forever?
Sabre
(1) How do you call this people in english?
peewee wrote:well sabre you are a tw@t, ask yourself if you deserve a chance
Sabre, Topic: Do twáts deserve another chance?,
babu wrote:actually what he did to his co-workers is irrelevant, IMO. Only thing that matters is from the employers perspective: ie does he get the job done? and is he good for business. Whether or not he screwed his work mates to get up ladder, shouldn't matter to an employer.
In fact i would value that kind of amibition (provided of course he knows the limits)
Leonmc0708 wrote:Thought this thread was about peewee and banning/reinstating him for a second.
**Mops Brow**
"Phew"
Return to Non Football Related Polls
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.