Liverpool FC Forum

by Smeg » Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:15 pm

by daxy1 » Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:19 pm

eh?    are you bored

by JoeTerp » Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:30 pm

I'd have to go with the 50 8 year olds, which reminds me of a joke about Michael Jackson

by adamnbarrett » Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:30 pm

the kids woukd well win.

It's like when 12 of us in year 11 have a game of football against the year 8's and there's like 40 of them. When you're running with the ball there's 8 of them running after you

by Sabre » Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:33 pm

SOS member #1499

Drummerphil, never forgotten.

by Smeg » Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:35 pm

by Sabre » Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:09 pm

All the kids have to do is 2000 year old military tactics. Pack together, one group advance towards the first leg, the second group towards the second. There would be some casualties in the front line, but if they pack well together, they'll unbalance the man and the battle is over, they can do whatever they want.

32 kids might be enough

SOS member #1499

Drummerphil, never forgotten.

by Elchris » Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:19 pm

by metalhead » Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:39 pm

by J*o*n*D*o*e » Fri Feb 16, 2007 12:25 am

where i live two 8 years old could do the job



















and the second kid would be holding the the other kids coat 

by babu » Fri Feb 16, 2007 2:00 am

no contest

                                   *    *    *    *    *

by jkop » Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:51 am

Smeg wrote:Right, if we staged a fight to the death, 1 adult verses 50 8year olds?

No weapons allowed, just hitting/biting/kicking etc??

Smeg now be honest where you happy slapped by a few kids? is that why you're asking this question.

Were not Brazil were Norn Iron.
          Faugh a Ballagh.
                YNWA
        Healy......Healy !!!!!

by Dundalk » Sun Feb 18, 2007 12:44 am

babu wrote:no contest

by CardinalRed » Sun Feb 18, 2007 6:45 pm

What a wierd thread...........!!!

                 

by peterc1992 » Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:21 pm