Liverpool FC Forum

by **andy_g** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:26 pm

... and ..........

by **woof woof !** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:26 pm

Groooooooaaaaaaaaaaallllllllllllllll

by **andy_g** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:26 pm

bu.gger!!! :laugh:

by **andy_g** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:28 pm

can someone explain the offside rule please? :lookaround

by **woof woof !** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:28 pm

Damn , Andy nipped in :angry:

Anybody having probs posting ? My last three have each taken 30 + seconds to process .

by **andy_g** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:28 pm

because you were active in an offside posting position?

by **The Red Baron** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:32 pm

I am fed up reading sh!te in here how about some stimulating debate Ifound this particularly enlightening;General Theory of Relativity

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

After 1905, Einstein continued working in all three of his works in the 1905 papers. He made important contributions to the quantum theory, but increasingly he sought to extend the special theory of relativity to phenomena involving acceleration. The key to an elaboration emerged in 1907 with the principle of equivalence, in which gravitational acceleration was held a priori indistinguishable from acceleration caused by mechanical forces; gravitational mass was therefore identical with inertial mass. Einstein elevated this identity, which is implicit in the work of Isaac Newton, to a guiding principle in his attempts to explain both electromagnetic and gravitational acceleration according to one set of physical laws. In 1907 he proposed that if mass were equivalent to energy, then the principle of equivalence required that gravitational mass would interact with the apparent mass of electromagnetic radiation, which includes light. By 1911, Einstein was able to make preliminary predictions about how a ray of light from a distant star, passing near the Sun, would appear to be attracted, or bent slightly, in the direction of the Sun's mass. At the same time, light radiated from the Sun would interact with the Sun's mass, resulting in a slight change toward the infrared end of the Sun's optical spectrum. At this juncture Einstein also knew that any new theory of gravitation would have to account for a small but persistent anomaly in the perihelion motion of the planet Mercury.

About 1912, Einstein began a new phase of his gravitational research, with the help of his mathematician friend Marcel Grossmann, by phrasing his work in terms of the tensor calculus of Tullio Levi-Civita and Gregorio Ricci-Curbastro. The tensor calculus greatly facilitated calculations in four-dimensional space-time, a notion that Einstein had obtained from Hermann Minkowski's 1907 mathematical elaboration of Einstein's own special theory of relativity. Einstein called his new work the general theory of relativity. After a number of false starts, he published the definitive form of the general theory in late 1915. In it the gravitational field equations were covariant; that is, similar to Maxwell's equations, the field equations took the same form in all equivalent frames of reference. To their advantage from the beginning, the covariant field equations gave the observed perihelion motion of the planet Mercury. In its original form, Einstein's general relativity has been verified numerous times in the past 60 years, especially during solar-eclipse expeditions when Einstein's light-deflection prediction could be tested.

Nothing better than a spot of light reading.

by **woof woof !** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:34 pm

That was never offside . :angry:

by **andy_g** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:36 pm

F.uck einstein. the pressing matter is whether evolution follows the Darwinian or Lamarckian model and which of those models is best equipped to scupper the scourge of creationism.

by **The Red Baron** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:40 pm

exactly

by **woof woof !** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:50 pm

Never offside , and this proves it .
Much of the fundamental understanding of chaotic dynamics involves concepts from information theory, a field developed primarily in the context of practical communication. Concepts from information theory used in the chaos includes metric entropy, topologoical entropy, Markov partitions, and symbolic dynamics. It is possible to use the close connection between the theory of chaotic systems and information theory in a way that is more than purely formal. In particular, it can be shown that the recent realization of chaos can be controlled with small perturbations can be utilized to cause the symbolic dynamics of a chaotic system to track a prescribed symbol sequence thus allowing WOOF TO DRIFT INTO ANY DESIRED POSITION whilst ignoring the signal from a chaotic oscillator or referee. The natural complexity of chaos thus provides a vehicle for information transmission in the usual sense displaying quite clearly that WOOF was not off side .

by **taff** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:58 pm

Your last post has caused my brain to crash :angry:

by **taff** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:58 pm

I have to go out for a few hours I trust you will refrain from getting to page 1000 :no

by **woof woof !** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:07 pm

It will require another 100 plus posts , and I have to go to the Chippy .

or should that be

yum . ?

Liverpool FC Forum

The Real World - The Dog and Gorilla

Who is online