by JC_81 » Tue Apr 04, 2006 5:50 pm
We've had this debate before about Aimar v Garcia and I quoted a few statistics. Aimar is undoubtedly better on the ball and is a better passer than Garcia, but similarly he drifts in and out of games, is lightweight and is difficult to fit into a system without making him the focal point of it. Then there's the question of whether he'd adapt to the premiership.
Personally I think Aimar is overrated, for a 'second striker' his end-product is poor. I'm not sure what his assist statistics are, but his scoring record is poor for a guy that plays in such an attacking position. Here's his league scoring record:
96-97 River Plate
97-98 River Plate 4 Goals, 15 Games
98-99 River Plate 3 Goals, 21 Games
99-00 River Plate 12 Goals, 30 Games
00-01(déc) River Plate 2 Goals, 16 Games
00-01 Valence CF 2 Goals, 10 Games
01-02 Valence CF 5 Goals, 32 Games (2 Goals in CL)
02-03 Valence CF 8 Goals, 31 Games (3 Goals in CL)
03-04 Valence CF 4 Goals, 25 Games
04-05 Valence CF 4 Goals, 31 Games (1+1 Goals,CL + UEFA Cup)
05-06 Valence CF 4 Goals, 28 Games
Compare this to Garcia's record for us...
1st team games: 90
1st team goals: 23
Now I'm no expert, but 23 goals in not even 2 full seasons from Garcia is top class..... and consider that Aimar has scored 25 in just under 4 seasons.
It's not all down to goals I know, but I couldn't find assist statistics for Aimar. But from watching him play I don't think he assists any more than Garcia
Basically I don't think there's room for Garcia and Aimar at Liverpool and I wouldn't swap Garcia for Aimar personally.
Last edited by
JC_81 on Tue Apr 04, 2006 5:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.