A further link, an update on that last post about the suspect 'Aswat'!!
http://sify.com/news/fullstory.php?id=13913208
LIVERPOOLANYTIME wrote:The Red Baron wrote:peewee wrote:LIVERPOOLANYTIME wrote:However at the same time, it proves that he should not have been shot that many times with a view to kill. I am not saying dont shoot him, but shoot to incapacitate. I mean this MUST be possible if the SO19 (gun) squad have been trained properly
The police were left with no option they had to shoot to kill.If they had shot him in the arm or leg he would have still been able to detonate a bomb if he had been carrying one.Iam sure they have been trained to the highest level.
It was not the officers who shot the man who got it wrong it was the inteligence they were given that was wrong.Saying that, if this fellah had stopped when he was ordered to he would still be alive today. Earlier reports on Sky news stated he was in this country illegaly as his visa had expired,this is the only explanation I can see for him not stopping.[with the information available]With the events of the past few weeks it was madness to run illegal immigrant or not,this man paid the ultimate price with his life.
I personally feel if this situation were to arise again I would want the police to react in the same manner,the officers on that day were convinced this man was a bomber and did what they thought was right.
Sky news are currently runnig a poll;
Should the police revue there shoot to kilol policy
as it stands now 88% say no.
Look two of you have qouted me on the thing about incapacitating the fella....Which is probably right that he would still have been able to detonate a bomb (if it was the case).
People dont seem to realise that i said this before it had been confirmed he was not a terrorist and i was wary in case it wasnt and what it would mean.........And ah look, HE WASNT A TERRORIST, so i feel my point was a bit on the fair side considering an innocent man was shot dead!!
However, if it WAS a terrorist then of course Shoot to Kill...no doubt!
But let me tell you why i had a feeling it was a mistake:
*If they were tracking him (as has been reported) from his home address.....then WHY THE F>UCK did they ALLOW him to not ONLY get onto a packed BUS, but also ENTER the tube station and give him the OPPURTUNITY to get amongst a heap (literally) of people?? Its not as if Buses and tubes have not been attacked recently FFS!!
Now this shows the intelligence was extremely poor.....Therefore IMO IT WAS NOT THE GUYS FAULT........!!
Poor intelligence is the cause of this innocent killing.
Ok, fair enough he (supposedly) had a visa that had run out, so this may have been a reason for him not stopping!! But HOW DO WE KNOW he was asked to stop anyway?? We only have the police word for it, just like the police said that Liverpool fans had kicked off the gate in Hillsborough (which of course was not the case, but it took a while to have the evidence for that!!.)...The Police DO lie you know.....Think about it, thay have KILLED an innocent man, people are naturally going to TRY and cover their backs.
[/URL][/IMG]
'Its amazing how much things differ'
It is nice to hear that TBH, although of course I am not saying all this Iraqi official will say would be 'Gospel Truth', but there are people that are not as lucky as you to be able to access such Candid information, and also others that couldnt give a f.uck anyway!!!
LIVERPOOLANYTIME wrote:cisses_gona_get_ya wrote:This topics still on the go I suppose Liverpool anytimes biography is in it also
Haha, funny Lynds!!!![]()
But yea people, I just found this and it is related to these attacks, there is some video footage to watch and some VERY interesting reading too!!
I dont normally trust FOX News, but TBH if anyone WAS NOT going to show something like this, IT WOULD BE THEM!!!
Video should auto start and its only about 3-4mins, its basicaly a segment between adverts, wwhich will just show those that dont know how quick the commercials come on over there.![]()
Nearly forgot the link there!!![]()
http://www.infowars.com/article....set.htm




(sorry I mean Scott hehe!!!
) for some reason I thought 'Paul C' had replied there!!! Oh well, anyway sorry about that!!


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests