Liverpool FC Forum

by **chiggz_likes_owen** » Tue Jan 04, 2005 6:09 pm

Some of you guys are seriously so sensitive. I get slagged of one thread I type. Click it, read it and if you wanna reply to it, don't reply sh*t.

I rest my case

by **andy_g** » Tue Jan 04, 2005 6:12 pm

chiggz_likes_owen wrote:I rest my case

that's good because your case was looking a little tired, chigzz

oops, alomost forgot this

by **Alanay** » Wed Jan 05, 2005 9:12 am

That's why football is the best game. Nothing compares to it.... You can never know what happen when the ball is rolled...

by **Judge** » Wed Jan 05, 2005 9:16 am

ManUtd wrote:If mistakes weren't made to other teams, where would they be now?!

Think about it, you're not the only team who gets unfair desisions at times.

yer right, spurs got a bad one last night

by **Boocity** » Wed Jan 05, 2005 10:08 am

The Return of the Judge wrote:
ManUtd wrote:If mistakes weren't made to other teams, where would they be now?!

Think about it, you're not the only team who gets unfair desisions at times.

yer right, spurs got a bad one last night

Bad one? That was as far over the line as kluivert was offside. Anyway if it had of been given Manu would have been given another 10 min stoppage time to ensure they got an equilizer :laugh:

by **wee_boi888** » Wed Jan 05, 2005 10:08 am

You can't change the past mate.
And also - im pretty sure with the Newcastle game both attackers were behind the line of defence. That's not offside then if memory serves me correctly. To be offside, the passer must be in front of the last defender and the reciever be behind it.

It was a fair goal - but please correct me if im wrong with the rules with the game

by **Boocity** » Wed Jan 05, 2005 10:29 am

wee_boi888 wrote:You can't change the past mate.
And also - im pretty sure with the Newcastle game both attackers were behind the line of defence. That's not offside then if memory serves me correctly. To be offside, the passer must be in front of the last defender and the reciever be behind it.

It was a fair goal - but please correct me if im wrong with the rules with the game

If Kluivert had not stuck the ball in the back of the net there would be no problem. The problem is he was interfereing with play. He gained a distinct advantage by being ten million miles in an offside position

by **simic_ie** » Wed Jan 05, 2005 1:46 pm

But it was a legal goal by the idiotic new interprtation of the offside law. IT should just go back to being if you are offside you are offside end of story, none of this is he interfering with play sh*t. The last week has shown that some referees just dont have the common sense to apply these laws

by **Red_Si** » Wed Jan 05, 2005 1:54 pm

We would be 9 points better off in the league.

by **Judge** » Wed Jan 05, 2005 1:56 pm

they did get the equaliser, coz the ref disallowed the winner, same result in my eyes

by **77-1099054247** » Wed Jan 05, 2005 6:43 pm

The Return of the Judge wrote:
ManUtd wrote:If mistakes weren't made to other teams, where would they be now?!

Think about it, you're not the only team who gets unfair desisions at times.

yer right, spurs got a bad one last night

Well, even Robinson stated that Tottenham were lucky just to get away with a free kick after the foul on Rio inside the area!

Another blatant refereeing mistake...

Liverpool FC Forum

Where would we be if...

Who is online