I don't know if this is good news or bad. This has certainly paved the way for Mr. O'Neill? Or will the board once again provoke the supporters and keep the incumbent fool? There is a limit to how much the fans will accept, and we are pretty damn close to that right now...
And one more thing... If Foolier dares to say "blessing in disguise" one more time I'll friggin shoot him dead
If football is banned in heaven. I'd rather go to hell.
I still maintain Curbishley's a decent choice for manager and no-one has been able to set out the reasons why he wouldn't be ? care to try ? And before you tell me he hasn't managed a BIG club like Liverpool which BIG club had GH managed before liverpool ?
Curbishly is a good manager no doubt about it I especially liked the way he handled parker when chelsea were looking,you know what I mean...right? Wouldnt mind him at all as the manager.
I dunno who we'll get. I personally dont think Mourinho would go to chelsea. Cant he see how abramovich treats his manager now? MON would be best choice but why not Ranieri, hed have something to proove and i do rate him, the chelsea players do as well. Curbishley would be good in a few years time but he still needs more. Id like king kenny back myself
Curbishley has never managed a team where he has had money to spend. We just dont know how well he is in the transfer market. O'neill hasn't had big money to spend but he has had money and he's done a good job of spending it properly. O'Neill for the job!
But to be honest I really couldn't care who we get at the mo, just so long as we get rid of GH!
it the man city board had any sense they would sack him in the summer even if they stay up. keegan at liverpool would be a disaster although at least then we might actually start attacking a bit. i don't think 2-2-6 really suits us though.