like Jonathan Woss and Graham Norton such high salaries for doing.....well.....pretty much fook all.The Manhattan Project wrote:I think the BBC should be maintained by licence fee under one condition, that it cuts its "entertainment" division, which would eliminate the need to paylike Jonathan Woss and Graham Norton such high salaries for doing.....well.....pretty much fook all.
The BBC should focus on only a few areas: 1- Education (documentaries and so forth like "The Blue Planet") 2- Sport (a few reserved events like Wimbledon, the Olympics, the Grand National, EURO's, World Cup, FA Cup Final etc...) 3- News and Current Events. This would be the content of their TV and radio output.
They would be allowed to venture into Entertainment, but this must only occur on a BBC channel that has commercials and would be entirely funded by commercial sponsorship. No public money would fund this part of the corporation.

Kharhaz wrote:Then shouldnt that be the way to move ? abandon the whole tv licence fee altogether? that way the bbc can live of income from the ads there making, I just think the whole thing is unfair, i read my local paper and saw an absurd amount of people penalised for not paying there licence fee then i laughed, not at them but me because im one of the mugs paying for the rubbish were seeing now !

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 114 guests