GYBS wrote:bunglemark2 wrote:Buy a map, or an atlas.....if you have to rely on a satellite hundreds of miles up in the sky to find the way from A to B, then you're probably too stupid to be driving in the first place....
I really don't get the obsession with them.
They make life easier for people that do a lot of driving and also help you through traffic problems and enable you to not have to stop and look at a map every two secs . And just because people use them certainly does not make them stupid .
bunglemark2 wrote:GYBS wrote:bunglemark2 wrote:Buy a map, or an atlas.....if you have to rely on a satellite hundreds of miles up in the sky to find the way from A to B, then you're probably too stupid to be driving in the first place....
I really don't get the obsession with them.
They make life easier for people that do a lot of driving and also help you through traffic problems and enable you to not have to stop and look at a map every two secs . And just because people use them certainly does not make them stupid .
Oh gimme a break, you tart....
Listen to the radio reports for traffic problems. Learn to read a map - like the previous poster said, it's not hard.....presuming you can read. And if you can't read, you're too dangerous to drive anyway - how the hell can you "read" road warning signs ?
Bad Bob wrote:Sat navs are potentially problematic because they rarely incorporate intangibles. They often go for shortest routes based on straightline distance but, as we all know, more circuitous routes on better roads are often much faster. As Bungle says, you'll never find a sat nav that compensates for traffic at certain times of day, the fact that the local sports stadium is just emptying when you're trying to drive by, it's a snowy day and the usual route has a steep hill that you don't want to mess with, certain neighbourhoods are not ones to be driving through at night, etc. Effective navigation is an art and should be cultivated, not a chore that should be relinquished to the latest gizmo. Think of the neurological benefits wayfinding gives your brain!
GYBS wrote:Bad Bob wrote:Sat navs are potentially problematic because they rarely incorporate intangibles. They often go for shortest routes based on straightline distance but, as we all know, more circuitous routes on better roads are often much faster. As Bungle says, you'll never find a sat nav that compensates for traffic at certain times of day, the fact that the local sports stadium is just emptying when you're trying to drive by, it's a snowy day and the usual route has a steep hill that you don't want to mess with, certain neighbourhoods are not ones to be driving through at night, etc. Effective navigation is an art and should be cultivated, not a chore that should be relinquished to the latest gizmo. Think of the neurological benefits wayfinding gives your brain!
Some sat navs recalulate with traffic reports etc so help you avoid those situations when needed - and if people are stupid enough to drive in bad weather snow etc with them , them doing it with a map will make no difference whatsoever - they will still be stupid enough to drive through the bad weather.
Sat navs are extremly useful if used correctly and used as a driving aid as opposed to a driving tool that you stick to religiously .
P.S. All the latest fighter jets etc come with GPS maps helping you where to go as opposed to using maps and doesnt seem to be harming them
Bad Bob wrote:GYBS wrote:Bad Bob wrote:Sat navs are potentially problematic because they rarely incorporate intangibles. They often go for shortest routes based on straightline distance but, as we all know, more circuitous routes on better roads are often much faster. As Bungle says, you'll never find a sat nav that compensates for traffic at certain times of day, the fact that the local sports stadium is just emptying when you're trying to drive by, it's a snowy day and the usual route has a steep hill that you don't want to mess with, certain neighbourhoods are not ones to be driving through at night, etc. Effective navigation is an art and should be cultivated, not a chore that should be relinquished to the latest gizmo. Think of the neurological benefits wayfinding gives your brain!
Some sat navs recalulate with traffic reports etc so help you avoid those situations when needed - and if people are stupid enough to drive in bad weather snow etc with them , them doing it with a map will make no difference whatsoever - they will still be stupid enough to drive through the bad weather.
Sat navs are extremly useful if used correctly and used as a driving aid as opposed to a driving tool that you stick to religiously .
P.S. All the latest fighter jets etc come with GPS maps helping you where to go as opposed to using maps and doesnt seem to be harming them
You're absolutely right, mate. They're a useful tool in the hands of intelligent people (just like maps are, after all). Unfortunately, too many people fundamentally rely on them to think for them and they run the risk of getting themselves into more bother than they might have experienced without the technology. In the case of this bus driver I mentioned, the sat nav meant he didn't have to think about his route and, crucially, that he didn't have to plan anything in advance. He was content to hop on board, program in the destination and let the navigator do the rest. As a result, he was not forearmed with any knowledge of the city in case things went wrong (which they did). Just like the best pilots know how to fly without instruments if necessary, the best navigators have the wherewithall to wayfind without technology if necessary. My worry is that too few people recognize that when they buy these things.
andy_g wrote:there have been some fiery and ferocious debates on this forum over the years; homosexuality, religion, crime and punishment, wars and terrorism.
i fear the debate over sat nav may become the darkest yet.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests