Liverpool FC Forum

only me » Sat Apr 08, 2017 2:26 pm wrote:

ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Sat Apr 08, 2017 2:25 pm wrote:F**king hell did we just miss another sitter?
At least we are creating chances

?? We haven't created shiite mate

On the radio it said Origi just got beaten to a header that would have been a certain goal and a couple of minutes later it said Woodburn was clean through

Edit - City winning 1-0

ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Sat Apr 08, 2017 2:27 pm wrote:

only me » Sat Apr 08, 2017 2:26 pm wrote:

ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Sat Apr 08, 2017 2:25 pm wrote:F**king hell did we just miss another sitter?
At least we are creating chances

?? We haven't created shiite mate

On the radio it said Origi just got beaten to a header that would have been a certain goal and a couple of minutes later it said Woodburn was clean through

Edit - City winning 1-0

I wish not even close.

We look pathetic Stoke are riding high with intense energy..Klopp is shell shocked waiting for I don't know what.

Wecare being outplayed by Stoke...

wow, sounds like we are doing okay on the radio

I canr believe we are playing a totally new line up. Clyne on the left wing... apparently it's a 3-4-2-1

easy goal by Stoke...

Origi keeps getting in good positions out wide and then looks up and no one's in the middle. It's painful to watch, we have gone far too negative. Maybe it's klopps masterplan to shove...

Oh ***** scrap all that we are 1-0 down

It's just said we've had a stonewall pen turned down?
Oh shyte, now they've gone up the other end and scored, hit us on the break 

No urgency. Need Coutinho out there to kick start things. This Stoke team are there for the taking if we up the level, they look distinctly average

Should have had a pen on Woodburn ... then Stoke counter and a easy goal for Walters.

FFS, free header

And now its official...Klopp has no one to blame but himself...We don't look like a football team and no reaction from the line.

UvS xR4GEx » Sat Apr 08, 2017 2:45 pm wrote:Should have had a pen on Woodburn ... then Stoke counter and a easy goal for Walters.

Yep, that's what the radio just said

ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Sat Apr 08, 2017 2:44 pm wrote:It's just said we've had a stonewall pen turned down?
Oh shyte, now they've gone up the other end and scored, hit us on the break 

I dont know which station you're listening to... but it wasnt a stonewall penalty... Ben Woodburn tried to trip on stoke's player's leg 

ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Sat Apr 08, 2017 2:44 pm wrote:It's just said we've had a stonewall pen turned down?
Oh shyte, now they've gone up the other end and scored, hit us on the break 

No penalty...Right decision by the ref