Page 1 of 1

Newkit law - Madder than saudi arabia ?

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 10:52 am
by woof woof !
An appeal court in Saudi Arabia has doubled the number of lashes and added a jail sentence as punishment for a woman who was gang-raped.

The victim was initially punished for violating laws on segregation of the sexes - she was in an unrelated man's car at the time of the attack.

When she appealed, the judges said she had been attempting to use the media to influence them.

The attackers' sentences - originally of up to five years - were doubled.

Extra penalties

According to the Arab News newspaper, the 19-year-old woman, who is from Saudi Arabia's Shia minority, was gang-raped 14 times in an attack in the eastern province a year-and-a-half ago.

Seven men from the majority Sunni community were found guilty of the rape and sentenced to prison terms ranging from just under a year to five years.

But the victim was also punished for violating Saudi Arabia's laws on segregation that forbid unrelated men and women from associating with each other. She was initially sentenced to 90 lashes for being in the car of a strange man.

On appeal, the Arab News reported that the punishment was not reduced but increased to 200 lashes and a six-month prison sentence.

The rapists also had their prison terms doubled. But the sentences are still low considering they could have faced the death penalty.

The Arab News quoted an official as saying the judges had decided to punish the girl for trying to aggravate and influence the judiciary through the media.

The victim's lawyer was suspended from the case, has had his licence to work confiscated, and faces a disciplinary session.





Following up on Dawsinos thread in Gen chat, if you had the power to serve sentence on condemend gang rapists what punishment would you recommend ? I'm stuck between choosing option 3 and 9.


:nod

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 11:11 am
by NANNY RED
I  was actually stuck between 7 and 8 but i went for 7
Ive got a 21 year old daughter just put it this way id want to get hold of the :censored: myself after 10 minutes thed be screaming for me to put them out there miserable little scubbag lives

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 11:24 am
by account deleted by request
Option seven for me too

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 12:48 pm
by dawson99
every punishment should be 7.

tie them up, let the family dish out whatever punishment they see fit, or if they dont wanna, they can use special people to do whatever they want. a bit of castration, dismemberment, death, that kind of thing would do nicely

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 2:46 pm
by Sabre
Seven, and once finnished, Eight.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 6:41 pm
by Dundalk
7 all day long!

Uncles and everything allowed to join in!!

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 9:54 pm
by LFC2007
I don't understand how and why the victim was punished for attempting to influence the judiciary through the media?

Strange.

Anyway, option 7 then option 2.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 1:16 am
by RUSHIE#9
I've gone for option 3 but would like to add a touch of options 7&8 to it. Allow the family to do the castrating in a public square!

Has a nice justification to it!

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 11:29 am
by Judge
option 9, with option 7 being an option also

cack english, but you get my meaning :D

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:45 pm
by ConnO'var
Death...... slowly..... over flaming coals....

Unforgiveable crime.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:56 pm
by Sabre
I don't know why option 8 is so ignored. Surely it's important to provide some justice by number 7, but setting an example to avoid future incidents is also important.

I think both in your country and mine were put heads on sticks for this purpose :D I know, a long time ago :D

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 4:41 pm
by Mikz
7 is no good...what if the victims family are all oaps

8 all day long brother