Page 1 of 3

Vote - For leon

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 1:40 pm
by Leonmc0708
Dawson ?

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 1:41 pm
by adamnbarrett
Tough choice but I voted Leon

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 1:41 pm
by Sabre
I voted Leon on this one.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 1:44 pm
by dawson99
All hail king leon.

Image

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 1:45 pm
by Leonmc0708
dawson99 wrote:All hail king leon.

Image

You have not voted for me though  :no

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:17 pm
by jkop
I voted for the top one Leon i think. ???  :D

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:19 pm
by 112-1077774096
i voted for leon along with advise to invest in a bullet proof vest to be worn backwards to save him from any backstabbing

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:20 pm
by dawson99
Actually Kevlar doesnt really work if someone is being stabbed. It all depends on the trajectory of course.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:22 pm
by 112-1077774096
but it doesnt have to be kevlar, there was bullet proof vests before the invention of kevlar   ???

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:24 pm
by dawson99
Armor Level Protects Against
Type I
(.22 LR; .380 ACP) This armor protects against .22 caliber Long Rifle Lead Round Nose (LR LRN) bullets, with nominal masses of 2.6 g (40 gr) at a reference velocity of 329 m/s (1080 ft/s ± 30 ft/s) and .380 ACP Full Metal Jacketed Round Nose (FMJ RN) bullets, with nominal masses of 6.2 g (95 gr) at a reference velocity of 322 m/s (1055 ft/s ± 30 ft/s).
Type IIA
(9 mm; .40 S&W) This armor protects against 9 mm Full Metal Jacketed Round Nose (FMJ RN) bullets, with nominal masses of 8.0 g (124 gr) at a reference velocity of 341 m/s (1120 ft/s ± 30 ft/s) and .40 S&W caliber Full Metal Jacketed (FMJ) bullets, with nominal masses of 11.7 g (180 gr) at a reference velocity of 322 m/s (1055 ft/s ± 30 ft/s). It also provides protection against the threats mentioned in [Type I].
Type II
(9 mm; .357 Magnum) This armor protects against 9 mm Full Metal Jacketed Round Nose (FMJ RN) bullets, with nominal masses of 8.0 g (124 gr) at a reference velocity of 367 m/s (1205 ft/s ± 30 ft/s) and 357 Magnum Jacketed Soft Point (JSP) bullets, with nominal masses of 10.2 g (158 gr) at a reference velocity of 436 m/s (1430 ft/s ± 30 ft/s). It also provides protection against the threats mentioned in [Types I and IIA].
Type IIIA
(High Velocity 9 mm; .44 Magnum) This armor protects against 9 mm Full Metal Jacketed Round Nose (FMJ RN) bullets, with nominal masses of 8.0 g (124 gr) at a reference velocity of 436 m/s (1430 ft/s ± 30 ft/s) and .44 Magnum Semi Jacketed Hollow Point (SJHP) bullets, with nominal masses of 15.6 g (240 gr) at a reference velocity of 436 m/s (1430 ft/s ± 30 ft/s). It also provides protection against most handgun threats, as well as the threats mentioned in [Types I, IIA, and II].
Type III
(Rifles) This armor protects against 7.62 mm Full Metal Jacketed (FMJ) bullets (U.S. Military designation M80), with nominal masses of 9.6 g (148 gr) at a reference velocity of 847 m/s (2780 ft/s ± 30 ft/s) or less. It also provides protection against the threats mentioned in [Types I, IIA, II, and IIIA].
Type IV
(Armor Piercing Rifle) This armor protects against .30 caliber armor piercing (AP) bullets (U.S. Military designation M2 AP), with nominal masses of 10.8 g (166 gr) at a reference velocity of 878 m/s (2880 ft/s ± 30 ft/s). It also provides at least single hit protection against the threats mentioned in [Types I, IIA, II, IIIA, and III].


ok, will look into it more

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:25 pm
by 112-1077774096
mmmm  ???


i like the cut of your gib

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:25 pm
by jkop
dawson you are a madman. :laugh:

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:28 pm
by dawson99
jkop wrote:dawson you are a madman. :laugh:

keep it down tho, or stu will shout at me again  :eyebrow

i actually sued to work for a bullet proof vest company, but they soon got shot of me

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:30 pm
by 112-1077774096
why did you have to sue them? wouldnt they give you the job otherwise

???

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:32 pm
by jkop
peewee wrote:why did you have to sue them? wouldnt they give you the job otherwise

???

peewee you know what he meant. :;):  :D