Liverpool Football Club Discussion
https://www.liverpoolfc-newkit.co.uk/
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:31 pmPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 10:15 pm
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 10:50 pm
Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 4:31 amPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 9:16 am Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 1:12 amPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 1:16 amI've gone for the Neil Armstrong not landing on the moon conspiracy 'cos unless you've got something like $15 billion to fund your own trip to the moon how the hell are you gonna prove they did land on the moon. All of the evidence is there as well, the U.S flag waving in the wind:
Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:49 amPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 12:49 pmPosted: Wed May 10, 2006 1:00 amSabre wrote:I've gone for the Neil Armstrong not landing on the moon conspiracy 'cos unless you've got something like $15 billion to fund your own trip to the moon how the hell are you gonna prove they did land on the moon. All of the evidence is there as well, the U.S flag waving in the wind:
Nope. The merkins were there. They placed some mirrors in order to do accurate distance measures (measurement through reflections) and those mirrors have been used by several international universities. So either Armstrong put them there or the aliens did.
Visit this site if you're interested
http://www.badastronomy.com/
They debunk bad science. And many conspiracies related with astronomy.
I voted for the JFK one, but actually it was the CIA.
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 6:56 amanti-hero wrote:Sabre wrote:I've gone for the Neil Armstrong not landing on the moon conspiracy 'cos unless you've got something like $15 billion to fund your own trip to the moon how the hell are you gonna prove they did land on the moon. All of the evidence is there as well, the U.S flag waving in the wind:
Nope. The merkins were there. They placed some mirrors in order to do accurate distance measures (measurement through reflections) and those mirrors have been used by several international universities. So either Armstrong put them there or the aliens did.
Visit this site if you're interested
http://www.badastronomy.com/
They debunk bad science. And many conspiracies related with astronomy.
I voted for the JFK one, but actually it was the CIA.
Why would the CIA assasinate JFK?
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 7:04 amRUSHIE#9 wrote:I've gone for the Neil Armstrong not landing on the moon conspiracy 'cos unless you've got something like $15 billion to fund your own trip to the moon how the hell are you gonna prove they did land on the moon. All of the evidence is there as well, the U.S flag waving in the wind:
the fact that the sun is casting shadows (not sure about this one to be honest).
Until you can go down to yer local Lunn POly and book a fortnight at the Costa Del Moon resort I suppose we'll never be able to prove this one.
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 8:15 amBamaga man wrote:RUSHIE#9 wrote:I've gone for the Neil Armstrong not landing on the moon conspiracy 'cos unless you've got something like $15 billion to fund your own trip to the moon how the hell are you gonna prove they did land on the moon. All of the evidence is there as well, the U.S flag waving in the wind:
the fact that the sun is casting shadows (not sure about this one to be honest).
Until you can go down to yer local Lunn POly and book a fortnight at the Costa Del Moon resort I suppose we'll never be able to prove this one.
Also on this subject there was the matter of the photo itself.
As you can see it's a picture perfect photo, something they reckon would be imposible to do considering there space suits were fitted with camera's around the midrift.
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 8:18 amPosted: Wed May 10, 2006 8:21 ampeewee wrote:and no dust etc etc etc