Page 1 of 7
Voting system - Get rid of the dead wood
Posted:
Mon Aug 22, 2005 9:47 amby 112-1077774096
should we have a system where as members we can vote people out of the forum?
we should be able to nominate someone who is acting like a pr1ck and then be able to vote them out. i think either 20 or 25 votes should be enough to get rid of the disruptive members. also if people know they can be voted out they may think twice about starting petty squabbles or being abusive to other members.
if someone is nominated for the vote, it can be done in poll form, if they then get 25 votes to be kicked off then the mods ban them.
only members who were registered before the vote are allowed to enter vote to stop people starting multiple memberships to get rid of people they have argued with.
what do you all think? its one way to steer people in the right direction. its not to be abused to get rid of newbies who start too many posts or post in the wrong area, just to be used against the abusive people on here who try to bully other members and resort to abuse when someone doesnt agree with them?
Posted:
Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:05 amby Woollyback
don't think so peewee, it would just end up starting more arguments than it was intended to stop in the first place
if someone really is being an arsehole then the mods can just ban them anyway
Posted:
Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:06 amby 112-1077774096
i vote for woolyback for dissagreeing with me 
Posted:
Mon Aug 22, 2005 4:26 pmby LFC #1
what is this, Big Brother?
I'll second the Woollyback vote though.
Posted:
Tue Aug 23, 2005 12:55 pmby Judge
Woollyback wrote:don't think so peewee, it would just end up starting more arguments than it was intended to stop in the first place
if someone really is being an arsehole then the mods can just ban them anyway
well said, damn those rusty bullet holes 
i think all the dammed would go over to jmac's new web page, when its finished, so it'll be like ''newkit forum part 2''.
judging by jmacs skills on banner and avatars etc, it'll be a damn good one 
Posted:
Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:12 pmby 76-1115222408
Lick a,rse!!! 
Posted:
Wed Aug 24, 2005 10:05 pmby 76-1115222408
resort to abuse when someone doesnt agree with them?
The above is a qoute from the initial post of this thread, and below is YOU (peewee) abusing someone when they didnt 'agree' with you!!
yes that was my plan, to break in and threaten everyone. c0cksmoker
Hmmm, maybe you should use your own ideas and plans (to ban people) on yourself too Peewee. The guy was making a lighthearted point and you call him a c.ocksmoker!!! WHY??
He didnt abuse YOU, so why do you abuse HIM??
I told people that there is crazy hypocrisy on here, and this goes to prove this!!
To me you have negated your WHOLE idea, with your OWN post!! Or is it OK for you and certain others to do this, but when it is done to you lot it is 'banning' criteria??
And people have a go at me and use me as scapegoat, just because I say what I want and stand by and fully back up my views and points, not only with further points but also links to external websites, I think people need to check themsleves IMO 
You know what - F.uck the status quo!!! It really is b.*ll*c*ks, one rule for some and another for others!!
Posted:
Thu Aug 25, 2005 1:27 amby 112-1077774096
LIVERPOOLANYTIME wrote:resort to abuse when someone doesnt agree with them?
The above is a qoute from the initial post of this thread, and below is YOU (peewee) abusing someone when they didnt 'agree' with you!!
yes that was my plan, to break in and threaten everyone. c0cksmoker
Hmmm, maybe you should use your own ideas and plans (to ban people) on yourself too Peewee. The guy was making a lighthearted point and you call him a c.ocksmoker!!! WHY??
He didnt abuse YOU, so why do you abuse HIM??
I told people that there is crazy hypocrisy on here, and this goes to prove this!!
To me you have negated your WHOLE idea, with your OWN post!! Or is it OK for you and certain others to do this, but when it is done to you lot it is 'banning' criteria??
And people have a go at me and use me as scapegoat, just because I say what I want and stand by and fully back up my views and points, not only with further points but also links to external websites, I think people need to check themsleves IMO
You know what - F.uck the status quo!!! It really is b.*ll*c*ks, one rule for some and another for others!!
if you dont like the status quo then you can always f*ck off and join some conspiracy forum where people may want to listen to the sh1t that you sprout.
also at no point did i say was immune to being voted out and if someone tries to vote me out for giving them abuse then so be it. you seem to have taken this thread personally. is that because you cant join a post without upsetting someone.
how many people have you threatened up to know, how many people have you abused, how many people have you argued with?
so you can lick my hairy @rse if you think that i have interest in your feelings you c0cksmoker
Posted:
Thu Aug 25, 2005 2:24 amby 76-1115222408
Thankyou for further making your post pointless!!!
F*uck off,haha, yea right!!!
Boo Hoo, I really took this thread peronally of course I did!!! No, I dont think so...Actually I made a lighthearted thread in response, which on the whole ws taken as such...even by yourself.
So stop being angry because YOU contradicted yourself!!!
Posted:
Thu Aug 25, 2005 2:28 amby 112-1077774096
and where did i contradict myself gangsta?
i cant seem to see that point. its very sad, you claim to have this education but you cant seem to grasp simple points, and you seem to not have the ability to learn.
how many people have now asked you to chill out, and you have still to learn anything from that.
i feel sorry for you, you seem to be some walter mitty character
Posted:
Thu Aug 25, 2005 2:48 amby 76-1115222408
If talking about banning people for abusing people and then doing it yourself is not a contradiction of terms, then I just dont know what is!!
You made the post, obviously speaking of others and wanting the 'regulars' to come and agree with you!! Dont try and make out NOW, that you were including yourself in the post, because if you did/have, you have basically created your downfall (if your 'Ban Poll' was in affect that is)!!!
Once again getting personal....education blah blah blah....whatever, whats that got to do with this..Nada!!
Name calling once again, walter mitty...haha, whatever!!!! You make me laugh I swear!!!
Always changing the subject to personal things, just deal with the subject man WTF!!!
Is that too hard to do?? Is it really??
Posted:
Thu Aug 25, 2005 2:48 amby 76-1115222408
Iiiii
Posted:
Thu Aug 25, 2005 2:55 amby 112-1077774096
Posted:
Thu Aug 25, 2005 2:57 amby 76-1115222408
Was a double post, so i deleted the whole post, but you have to have something there, it doesnt take one letter...Clear that up for you does it??