Page 2 of 2

PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2004 5:28 pm
by bRy
If possible I believe we should build a stadium of perhaps
80 000 and stay at Anfield due to the history and prestige attached to the ground.

It's got to be bigger than Old Trafford and better so as we could host events such as internationals, concerts and get greater amounts of ppl in for derbies and big European games. If this was to be achieved it would then be the supporters priorities to fill the new stadium and turn it into some cauldron that resembles something probably found in a large South American city (minus the barbed wire).

PostPosted: Fri Feb 27, 2004 1:44 pm
by Dom1
bRy wrote:It's got to be bigger than Old Trafford

Typical Jealous liverpool Fan!!  :p

PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2004 4:23 pm
by stmichael
we need a 60,000+ stadium to try and keep up with man u financially as do arsenal.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 3:14 pm
by Dom1
stmichael wrote:we need a 60,000+ stadium to try and keep up with man u financially as do arsenal.

typical jealous liverpool fan!!  :p

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2004 9:00 am
by Owzat
As I understand it expanding Anfield is not possible (correct me if I'm wrong). It is ridiculous that we should be one of the biggest clubs, the biggest in English history, and not have a new stadium (or one of the biggest). I wouldn't mind if our stadium is bigger than Old Trafford, but the most important thing is catering for ticket demand. We could easily fill a much larger stadium, to have delayed this long is disgraceful

PostPosted: Tue Apr 06, 2004 1:31 am
by DrLiverpool
Build new stadium with at least 70000+ seats. Whats the piont in building a stadium if its going to be smaller than old trafford or st.james' park.

new manager + new stadium
                  =
more money and premiership title and better players