Page 1 of 2

Do you want a new stadium? - Stanel Park for instance?

PostPosted: Thu Oct 31, 2002 12:38 am
by LFC4EVER
If you would explain why. And I meant STANLEY PARK for instance, sorry!

PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2002 1:07 pm
by salamenders
lfc may have more fan??

PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2003 9:18 pm
by royal blue mersey
Stanley Park belongs to the people of Merseyside so hands off redsh##es. We The People's Club don't want you bunch of ABUs in Stanley Park

Edited By Chris Rundle on Jan. 24 2003 at 07:12

PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2003 10:38 pm
by paul.t
The only way that we should build a new stadium, is if there is absolutly no chance of affecting tranfer revenue in the short term.  Otherwise whats the point if the team standards drop.

PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2003 8:45 pm
by HistoryGirl
i dont see why we have to move cant we simply expand Anfield?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2003 2:52 pm
by cheesecakery
yes id like one please

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2003 9:56 am
by offspring_and_gc_rule
liverpool should stay ay anfield. Anfield is our home but we need more seats for our fans. ???

PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2003 10:35 pm
by supersub
We should remove all the dog-s**t, broken bottles,discarded house-hold rubbish and the rest of the garbage that these park proud people have left behind on their once in blue moon amble through stanley park and build a nice new spacious stadium to house all us (fluent attacking) football starved followers. :p

PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2003 10:29 pm
by sangy
^^^^^^^^^^^YEP LIKE UR IDEA SUPERSUB  :D

PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2003 5:30 pm
by jaypap
i think a stadium should wait
lets bring some players and win the league 1st and then worry about a stadium...

PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2003 8:31 pm
by The Magician
Liverpool are the biggest club on Merseyside and deserve to have the biggest stadium in Merseyside.

PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 8:00 am
by Allacky
More than 70,000

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 6:53 pm
by Owzat
We should start building the stadium a.s.a.p, the league is a priority but the sale of the excess baggage should generate ample transfer funds and the squad isn't that bad

PostPosted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 2:11 pm
by Cool Hand Luke
It would be great if we could have a stadium of 60,000 or more it would help us progress financialy but we really should have 70,000, it heard the new stadium is going to be like a tourist attraction, great extra revenue

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2003 12:39 am
by Owzat
We could fill it easily. It sickens me to see average attendance figures with us unable to compete with the likes of manure and Newcastle because they have bigger grounds. It would be nice to have a new 60,000+ stadium and a team worthy to perform in it. New manager is top of my agenda though :(