Page 4 of 4

Re: Scholes v Lampard v Gerrard

PostPosted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 7:39 pm
by Benny The Noon
I'm not saying that Scholes wasnt a great player he was - nor am I saying Lampard is better than both Scholes or Gerrard - he isn't but he is/was a great player in his own right.

So much so that his fellow pros in Europe at one point thought he was in the top 3 in Europe.

Re: Scholes v Lampard v Gerrard

PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 5:27 pm
by Benny The Noon
StuYesThatStu » Wed Sep 25, 2013 7:33 pm wrote:
Benny The Noon » Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:36 pm wrote:And when top coaches declare Lampard a great player including Sven and Mourinho and Wenger ? Are they all wrong then ?

Or when top players like Carra call him great as well , plus players like Gerrard or even Messi or Ronaldo - are they all "wrong" Stu.

This is what Mourinho says about Lampard

"Between 2004 and 2007 he became, for sure, one of the best players in the world. So we motivate people also with individual challenges, and for him, for sure, that was a challenge we put there and he understood and he was ready for it.

Read more at http://www.espn.co.uk/football/sport/st ... pDYXeT4.99


Hahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!! :laugh:

Wenger has never called him great. Sven was weak and dropped Scholes for him which was flat out wrong and proved it by his international career and the way England have performed since then.

Carragher was certainly not a "top player".

Steven Gerrard never in a million years called him great... infact, he once directly said to me out of his own mouth the words "sh*te and overated" while intoxicated and said he'd rather play next to Danny Murphy... So where the f*ck you got that one from I'd love to know! :laugh:

.


Gerrard on Lampard

“Frank is a great player and has been for club and country for a very long time.”

Re: Scholes v Lampard v Gerrard

PostPosted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 7:06 pm
by Stu the Red
No quote, no date, no time, probably to the press, in an England press conference where he has to be diplomatic and careful.

Again, you're clearly too think to understand.

Re: Scholes v Lampard v Gerrard

PostPosted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 7:54 pm
by Benny The Noon
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... us-2258933

You said that Gerrard "never said Lampard was great"

When in fact that article proves he did and you are in fact wrong Stu.

Re: Scholes v Lampard v Gerrard

PostPosted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 8:26 pm
by Stu the Red
Benny The Noon » Sun Oct 13, 2013 7:54 pm wrote:http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/steven-gerrard-pays-tribute-tremendous-2258933

You said that Gerrard "never said Lampard was great"

When in fact that article proves he did and you are in fact wrong Stu.


What I actually said was that Steven Gerrard said he was "*****" and would "rather play with Danny Murphy"... now.... ask yourself... is Gerrard, really ever going to slate an England team mate in a newspaper? Or would he make a diplomatic comment?

Now again... ask yourself... would he feel like he has to make a diplomatic comment when he's ***** and talking about it with a family friend and Jamie Carragher?

As I said GYBS... get a f*cking clue ya muppet.

You're talking out of your birds ***** again!

Re: Scholes v Lampard v Gerrard

PostPosted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 8:34 pm
by Benny The Noon
StuYesThatStu » Sun Oct 13, 2013 8:26 pm wrote:
Benny The Noon » Sun Oct 13, 2013 7:54 pm wrote:http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/steven-gerrard-pays-tribute-tremendous-2258933

You said that Gerrard "never said Lampard was great"

When in fact that article proves he did and you are in fact wrong Stu.


What I actually said was that Steven Gerrard said he was "*****" and would "rather play with Danny Murphy"... now.... ask yourself... is Gerrard, really ever going to slate an England team mate in a newspaper? Or would he make a diplomatic comment?

Now again... ask yourself... would he feel like he has to make a diplomatic comment when he's ***** and talking about it with a family friend and Jamie Carragher?

As I said GYBS... get a f*cking clue ya muppet.

You're talking out of your birds ***** again!


Just to highlight to you what you actually did say


Steven Gerrard never in a million years called him great... infact, he once directly said to me out of his own mouth the words "sh*te and overated" while intoxicated and said he'd rather play next to Danny Murphy... So where the f*ck you got that one from I'd love to know! :laugh:


Now obviously i have proved what Gerrard has said so i expect you should be able to reciprocate and prove what Gerrard said about Lampard

But i fully expect another foul mouth rant instead

They do say constantly swearing masks the iniability to converse properly. Think you prove that very clearly

Re: Scholes v Lampard v Gerrard

PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 12:28 am
by Stu the Red
Benny The Noon » Sun Oct 13, 2013 8:34 pm wrote:
StuYesThatStu » Sun Oct 13, 2013 8:26 pm wrote:
Benny The Noon » Sun Oct 13, 2013 7:54 pm wrote:http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/steven-gerrard-pays-tribute-tremendous-2258933

You said that Gerrard "never said Lampard was great"

When in fact that article proves he did and you are in fact wrong Stu.


What I actually said was that Steven Gerrard said he was "*****" and would "rather play with Danny Murphy"... now.... ask yourself... is Gerrard, really ever going to slate an England team mate in a newspaper? Or would he make a diplomatic comment?

Now again... ask yourself... would he feel like he has to make a diplomatic comment when he's ***** and talking about it with a family friend and Jamie Carragher?

As I said GYBS... get a f*cking clue ya muppet.

You're talking out of your birds ***** again!


Just to highlight to you what you actually did say


Steven Gerrard never in a million years called him great... infact, he once directly said to me out of his own mouth the words "sh*te and overated" while intoxicated and said he'd rather play next to Danny Murphy... So where the f*ck you got that one from I'd love to know! :laugh:


Now obviously i have proved what Gerrard has said so i expect you should be able to reciprocate and prove what Gerrard said about Lampard

But i fully expect another foul mouth rant instead

They do say constantly swearing masks the iniability to converse properly. Think you prove that very clearly


You're quoting a dimplomatic comment he has to make in a national newspaper....

What part of that don't you understand? :laugh:  :laugh:  :laugh:  :laugh:

Re: Scholes v Lampard v Gerrard

PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:48 am
by devaney
Mods - doesn't this belong in the under 5's section - just a thought  :laugh:

Re: Scholes v Lampard v Gerrard

PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:19 am
by woof woof !
:D

Think the under 5's would find it embarrassing.

Re: Scholes v Lampard v Gerrard

PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 1:50 pm
by babu

They do say constantly swearing masks the iniability to converse properly.


Who are 'they' ?

Re: Scholes v Lampard v Gerrard

PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 2:55 pm
by Benny The Noon
babu » Mon Oct 14, 2013 1:50 pm wrote:

They do say constantly swearing masks the iniability to converse properly.


Who are 'they' ?


It's a general saying using the "Royal" They !

Re: Scholes v Lampard v Gerrard

PostPosted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 7:39 am
by babu
Never heard this saying.

Re: Scholes v Lampard v Gerrard

PostPosted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 10:33 pm
by Stu the Red
Its another Bennyism :D

Re: Scholes v Lampard v Gerrard

PostPosted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 9:46 am
by supersub
nursery school yard banter

Re: Scholes v Lampard v Gerrard

PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 2:34 am
by Stu the Red
So? :D