Are liverpool playing good football - Yes or no
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:44 pmhaha sorted it now 
no comments required, a simple yes or no will do
no comments required, a simple yes or no will do
Liverpool FC Forum
Liverpool Football Club Discussion
https://www.liverpoolfc-newkit.co.uk/
Are liverpool playing good football - Yes or no
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:44 pmPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:47 pmhaha some one has voted yes, benitez must be logged in
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:40 pmI voted yes, just to wind up people.
The question is now? or, as Puroresu has mentioned we haven't played good football in all this 4 years?
My opinion is that in those years we have seen great football. If someone tells me that Arsenal was the best team they've seen, then I must say that they have seen few teams.
I'd like to know what the people understands by "good football". For me "good football" and "fashionable and nice to watch football" are not the same thing.
If you (not you peeweee, anyone) consider what Arsenal are doing the best of the best in possesion football, I have to laugh, because Cruyff's Barcelona and Real Madrid have reached light years further (and I mean light years) on that camp. Especially Barcelona.
And I have seen people fancying Barcelona, with players better than Van Persie and Cesc, losing 3-0 in a CL final. Against a team that people didn't fancy too much, AC Milan, but that they had been doing what I call good football.
Good football for me is the football that keeps your goal without goals, and wins you games. If you dribble three players, and are dispossesed, and you see your holding midfielder outnumbered because they got you in a counter, then you're not doing nice football.
And I don't want to hear the "Oh the ball is meant to play in the grass" bóllocks. I've seen too many times my country boasting about our technique and how well we play with the ball in the ground, and failing.
Let's define first what's "good football". Then discuss.
The question is now? or, as Puroresu has mentioned we haven't played good football in all this 4 years?
My opinion is that in those years we have seen great football. If someone tells me that Arsenal was the best team they've seen, then I must say that they have seen few teams.
I'd like to know what the people understands by "good football". For me "good football" and "fashionable and nice to watch football" are not the same thing.
If you (not you peeweee, anyone) consider what Arsenal are doing the best of the best in possesion football, I have to laugh, because Cruyff's Barcelona and Real Madrid have reached light years further (and I mean light years) on that camp. Especially Barcelona.
And I have seen people fancying Barcelona, with players better than Van Persie and Cesc, losing 3-0 in a CL final. Against a team that people didn't fancy too much, AC Milan, but that they had been doing what I call good football.
Good football for me is the football that keeps your goal without goals, and wins you games. If you dribble three players, and are dispossesed, and you see your holding midfielder outnumbered because they got you in a counter, then you're not doing nice football.
And I don't want to hear the "Oh the ball is meant to play in the grass" bóllocks. I've seen too many times my country boasting about our technique and how well we play with the ball in the ground, and failing.
Let's define first what's "good football". Then discuss.
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:44 pmSabre wrote:I voted yes, just to wind up people.
The question is now? or, as Puroresu has mentioned we haven't played good football in all this 4 years?
My opinion is that in those years we have seen great football. If someone tells me that Arsenal was the best team they've seen, then I must say that they have seen few teams.
I'd like to know what the people understands by "good football". For me "good football" and "fashionable and nice to watch football" are not the same thing.
If you (not you peeweee, anyone) consider what Arsenal are doing the best of the best in possesion football, I have to laugh, because Cruyff's Barcelona and Real Madrid have reached light years further (and I mean light years) on that camp. Especially Barcelona.
And I have seen people fancying Barcelona, with players better than Van Persie and Cesc, losing 3-0 in a CL final. Against a team that people didn't fancy too much, AC Milan, but that they had been doing what I call good football.
Good football for me is the football that keeps your goal without goals, and wins you games. If you dribble three players, and are dispossesed, and you see your holding midfielder outnumbered because they got you in a counter, then you're not doing nice football.
And I don't want to hear the "Oh the ball is meant to play in the grass" bóllocks. I've seen too many times my country boasting about our technique and how well we play with the ball in the ground, and failing.
Let's define first what's "good football". Then discuss.
a simple yes or no would do sabre
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 3:25 pmpeewee
This is an unfair poll. It needs to be dated. I am an optimist by nature. Maybe if you'd said for games in the epl 1-thru watever have we played good football, i'd vote. but this makes me not wanna vote, even though i agree with your sentiment, only because i have an understanding from all your previous posts.
had a few drinks, hope u follow wat i mean. May edit this tomorrow.
ps sorry sabre if you said the same thing, i just can't read it at the moment
This is an unfair poll. It needs to be dated. I am an optimist by nature. Maybe if you'd said for games in the epl 1-thru watever have we played good football, i'd vote. but this makes me not wanna vote, even though i agree with your sentiment, only because i have an understanding from all your previous posts.
had a few drinks, hope u follow wat i mean. May edit this tomorrow.
ps sorry sabre if you said the same thing, i just can't read it at the moment
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 3:27 pmI think yes what about you?
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 10:55 pmno enough said
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 2:18 amnanny understands it. its a general question, i didn't want it to be specific, its a simple 'are we playing good football'. the answer has to be no. taking aside sabres vote the score would now be 7 no's and 3 yes's.
the football we are playing is tripe to be fair
the football we are playing is tripe to be fair
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 2:50 ampeewee wrote:nanny understands it. its a general question, i didn't want it to be specific, its a simple 'are we playing good football'. the answer has to be no. taking aside sabres vote the score would now be 7 no's and 3 yes's.
the football we are playing is tripe to be fair
Oi, a simple yes or no will do Peewee.
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 3:02 amBad Bob wrote:peewee wrote:nanny understands it. its a general question, i didn't want it to be specific, its a simple 'are we playing good football'. the answer has to be no. taking aside sabres vote the score would now be 7 no's and 3 yes's.
the football we are playing is tripe to be fair
Oi, a simple yes or no will do Peewee.
i think no, what about you
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:09 pmPointless thread as anyone who says yes is lying.
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:22 pmLeonmc0708 wrote:Pointless thread as anyone who says yes is lying.
yes you are right, i wanted to see if anyone genuinely thought we were
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:39 pmpeewee wrote:Leonmc0708 wrote:Pointless thread as anyone who says yes is lying.
yes you are right, i wanted to see if anyone genuinely thought we were
Simple simon.
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:43 pmLeonmc0708 wrote:peewee wrote:Leonmc0708 wrote:Pointless thread as anyone who says yes is lying.
yes you are right, i wanted to see if anyone genuinely thought we were
Simple simon.
yes or no, did you vote yet
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 2:42 pmwe haven't played well since the derby match at home.