Liverpool FC Forum

Great Britain's Mo Farah missed two drugs tests before he went on to become a double gold medallist at the 2012 Olympics, a newspaper has claimed.

According to the Daily Mail,  Farah's first missed test appears to have been in early 2010, months before he joined Alberto Salazar's Nike Oregon Project.

The Mail says the second one came at Farah's home in February 2011, when he claimed not to have heard the doorbell.

Reg » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:32 pm wrote:Rio Ferdinand missed a drugs test as well. So what?  Two out of how many?

woof woof ! » Thu Jun 18, 2015 11:54 pm wrote:

Reg » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:32 pm wrote:Rio Ferdinand missed a drugs test as well. So what?  Two out of how many?

Three !

Lighten up Reg FFS !   :D

Buck Rodgers » Tue Jun 16, 2015 9:11 pm wrote:Sorry but there is no proof at all to back up any accusations that Radcliffe is anything other than a clean athelete

Radcliffe was one of the most vocal anti drugs athelete a - do you not remember her placard and protests at the Europeans I think it was ?

She worked hard under her coach to get that good at running the marathon and earned her WR

Every now and then a record is smashed by someone and stays there for a long time - that doesn't automatically suggest performance enhancing drugs and it's a shame if that's starts to become the immediate thinking

Here is a recent interview from her I regards drugs and her demands for more testing and stronger testing

http://www.runnersworld.com/newswire/pa ... suspicions

fivecups » Fri Jun 26, 2015 9:22 pm wrote:

Buck Rodgers » Tue Jun 16, 2015 9:11 pm wrote:Sorry but there is no proof at all to back up any accusations that Radcliffe is anything other than a clean athelete

Radcliffe was one of the most vocal anti drugs athelete a - do you not remember her placard and protests at the Europeans I think it was ?

She worked hard under her coach to get that good at running the marathon and earned her WR

Every now and then a record is smashed by someone and stays there for a long time - that doesn't automatically suggest performance enhancing drugs and it's a shame if that's starts to become the immediate thinking

Here is a recent interview from her I regards drugs and her demands for more testing and stronger testing

http://www.runnersworld.com/newswire/pa ... suspicions

Buck, she can deny it all she wants but 3 minutes faster than any other woman in history can equal only one thing...

Buck Rodgers » Sat Jun 27, 2015 6:28 pm wrote:

fivecups » Fri Jun 26, 2015 9:22 pm wrote:

Buck Rodgers » Tue Jun 16, 2015 9:11 pm wrote:Sorry but there is no proof at all to back up any accusations that Radcliffe is anything other than a clean athelete

Radcliffe was one of the most vocal anti drugs athelete a - do you not remember her placard and protests at the Europeans I think it was ?

She worked hard under her coach to get that good at running the marathon and earned her WR

Every now and then a record is smashed by someone and stays there for a long time - that doesn't automatically suggest performance enhancing drugs and it's a shame if that's starts to become the immediate thinking

Here is a recent interview from her I regards drugs and her demands for more testing and stronger testing

http://www.runnersworld.com/newswire/pa ... suspicions

Buck, she can deny it all she wants but 3 minutes faster than any other woman in history can equal only one thing...

How many times was she tested positive ?

How about she trained bloody hard day in day out to produce wonderful performances on the road

She proved herself clean.

You and anyone has no proof to say she was on drugs.