Liverpool FC Forum

peewee wrote:so lando is banned again, is sabre banned? what have they been banned for?

landos banned for.. well for being lando i guess but im not sure...

sabre's not banned though.. just has a funny new avatar or sumthin... shame though innit ?!     

aCe' wrote:on a serious note though... stu's been banned long enough dont u think ? surely having him back with a few cards in his pocket like lando had wouldnt harm anyone now would it ? footie discussion could use one or two more like him ...

s@int wrote:There is no easy answer other than people learn to respect others views no matter how daft they may be.

there is more chance of knitting fog than that happening on here mate

s@int wrote:I don't believe there is an easy answer to posters like Stu. They add a lot to the football chat, but  can't seem to resist insulting and abusing people once the discussion gets a little heated.

A film forum I go on has a strict policy on abusing the automatic swearing censor, if you write c.unt to avoid the automatic censor kicking in its an automatic ban. Whether being called a is any less offensive than being called a kunt is another matter and no doubt causes just as many problems as it solves.

There is no easy answer other than people learn to respect others views no matter how daft they may be.

i can imagine you saying to a client who wants a loan

s@int the bank manager: ''ermm...ok Mr Smith the answer is flat no!''

''why?'' asks Mr Smith

s@int replies: ''coz your a c'unt''.

Judge wrote:

s@int wrote:I don't believe there is an easy answer to posters like Stu. They add a lot to the football chat, but  can't seem to resist insulting and abusing people once the discussion gets a little heated.

A film forum I go on has a strict policy on abusing the automatic swearing censor, if you write c.unt to avoid the automatic censor kicking in its an automatic ban. Whether being called a is any less offensive than being called a kunt is another matter and no doubt causes just as many problems as it solves.

There is no easy answer other than people learn to respect others views no matter how daft they may be.

i can imagine you saying to a client who wants a loan

s@int the bank manager: ''ermm...ok Mr Smith the answer is flat no!''

''why?'' asks Mr Smith

s@int replies: ''coz your a c'unt''.

I think you have somehow got the idea I work in a bank Judge? My wife works in a bank, and my son worked in a bank until recently, I don't.

In other words I am sorry Judge but your application for a loan has been turned down 

s@int wrote:

Judge wrote:

s@int wrote:I don't believe there is an easy answer to posters like Stu. They add a lot to the football chat, but  can't seem to resist insulting and abusing people once the discussion gets a little heated.

A film forum I go on has a strict policy on abusing the automatic swearing censor, if you write c.unt to avoid the automatic censor kicking in its an automatic ban. Whether being called a is any less offensive than being called a kunt is another matter and no doubt causes just as many problems as it solves.

There is no easy answer other than people learn to respect others views no matter how daft they may be.

i can imagine you saying to a client who wants a loan

s@int the bank manager: ''ermm...ok Mr Smith the answer is flat no!''

''why?'' asks Mr Smith

s@int replies: ''coz your a c'unt''.

I think you have somehow got the idea I work in a bank Judge? My wife works in a bank, and my son worked in a bank until recently, I don't.

In other words I am sorry Judge but your application for a loan has been turned down 

Because he's a kunt? 

dawson99 wrote:

s@int wrote:

Judge wrote:

s@int wrote:I don't believe there is an easy answer to posters like Stu. They add a lot to the football chat, but  can't seem to resist insulting and abusing people once the discussion gets a little heated.

A film forum I go on has a strict policy on abusing the automatic swearing censor, if you write c.unt to avoid the automatic censor kicking in its an automatic ban. Whether being called a is any less offensive than being called a kunt is another matter and no doubt causes just as many problems as it solves.

There is no easy answer other than people learn to respect others views no matter how daft they may be.

i can imagine you saying to a client who wants a loan

s@int the bank manager: ''ermm...ok Mr Smith the answer is flat no!''

''why?'' asks Mr Smith

s@int replies: ''coz your a c'unt''.

I think you have somehow got the idea I work in a bank Judge? My wife works in a bank, and my son worked in a bank until recently, I don't.

In other words I am sorry Judge but your application for a loan has been turned down 

Because he's a kunt? 

dawson99 wrote:

s@int wrote:

Judge wrote:

s@int wrote:I don't believe there is an easy answer to posters like Stu. They add a lot to the football chat, but  can't seem to resist insulting and abusing people once the discussion gets a little heated.

A film forum I go on has a strict policy on abusing the automatic swearing censor, if you write c.unt to avoid the automatic censor kicking in its an automatic ban. Whether being called a is any less offensive than being called a kunt is another matter and no doubt causes just as many problems as it solves.

There is no easy answer other than people learn to respect others views no matter how daft they may be.

i can imagine you saying to a client who wants a loan

s@int the bank manager: ''ermm...ok Mr Smith the answer is flat no!''

''why?'' asks Mr Smith

s@int replies: ''coz your a c'unt''.

I think you have somehow got the idea I work in a bank Judge? My wife works in a bank, and my son worked in a bank until recently, I don't.

In other words I am sorry Judge but your application for a loan has been turned down 

Because he's a kunt? 

dont give that bandwagon jumper dawson a loan either for the very same reason