Page 3 of 5
Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 9:27 am
by laza
LFC #1 wrote:TheoRacle wrote:I'm afraid I'm with Babu on this one LFC. Remembering last time at the airport and the treatment the Aussies got I can easily imagine one or two 'fans' being there to 'encourage' the officials too.
I hope I'm just old and cynical but these south american's take their football pretty seriously. Remember the Columbian(?) defender who got shot after their exit a few years back?
Yeh i know, they are very passionate, but the airport incident was staged. It was mostly hired goons who were there, I guess it worked though.
You're probably right Babu, if Australia got a result there could defo be trouble. But Uruguay will win so no need to worry
You seem very keen for those Uros to win LFC #1, even for a kiwi.
Im wondering whether your actually Kevin Sheedy or some other insecure Aussie rules guys who gets very worried and jealous every four years
Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 10:20 am
by babu
no mate he's a sheep shagger, no doubt.
Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 11:02 am
by zarababe
Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 8:24 pm
by Lionheart
Almost kick-off time and I'm pumped. We'd better win this otherwise I'm moving to New Zealand and taking up rugby!!!
Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 8:25 pm
by Lionheart
I can cope with a slim loss but would prefer if we scored an away goal. Anything greater than 2-0 down and we could be history.
C'mon Aussie, C'mon, C'mon!!!!
Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 9:21 pm
by drummerphil
I was hoping Sky sports might have it on especially with so many uk based players in the Aussie team........but alas not to be
Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 10:52 pm
by drummerphil
one nil defeat away in Uruguay is a cracking result for Australia,certainly my favourites now with the home leg to come.
Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 11:10 pm
by Lionheart
1-0 is reasonable...would have preferred an away goal. Kewell was !! Looked lazy and slow.
Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 11:18 pm
by drummerphil
Lionheart wrote:Kewell was !! Looked lazy and slow.
could have told you that,and i didnt even watch it
Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 11:50 pm
by Lionheart
drummerphil wrote:Lionheart wrote:Kewell was
!! Looked lazy and slow.
could have told you that,and i didnt even watch it
It's so bl00dy frustrating because the lad has all the skill in the world. The bugger had better fire on Wednesday night, otherwise I'll join you and Judge in the 'I hate Kewell' class!!!
Posted:
Sun Nov 13, 2005 2:45 am
by LFC #1
Australia were excellent in the first half hour and probably deserved to go in lvel at HT. Uruguay dominated most of the 2nd half though, and it could've easilt turned into 2 or 3 nil.
Overall though a pretty good result and performance by Australia, really sets the tie up for the return leg in Sydney.
How about those Wallabies though? 7 losses in a row now, while the All Blacks keep on getting better beating Ireland 45-7.
Posted:
Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:01 am
by laza
Yeah im happy enough but also would have preferred a 2-1 loss to a 1 nil loss
Good effort for guys and hopefully history can repeat itself as 4 years ago with home side taking a 1-0 lead for second leg and going down 3-0 in 2nd leg
Posted:
Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:03 am
by Lionheart
Laza, babu...either of you going to be in Sydney for the match??