Liverpool FC Forum

C-R » Tue Jul 21, 2015 1:51 pm wrote:Raheem at his very best this morning   

https://vine.co/v/e6HdqJ5qiip

Wasn't he shown nutmegging a couple of his team mates in training the other day? The media is trying their best to make him out to be a football savant...

Man City got stuffed 4-2 by Stuttgart in their last pre-season friendly, which is impressive when you consider that Stuttgart only just missed relegation from the Bundesliga.

Two hours after the match Sterling was pictured on the town getting on the beers 

Watched him against Chelsea.  200 k per week passenger.

The Good Yank » Mon Aug 17, 2015 9:31 am wrote:Watched him against Chelsea.  200 k per week passenger.

He got in down the line past Ivanovic a few times. Probably the worst I've seen Ivanovic play (not just on Sterling, but throughout the game). Sterling still looks as 1 dimensional as he did for us- just run fast down the line and put a poor cross in.

wasn't he subbed at half time against Newcastle?

He's struggling by all accounts. Seems like the City fans are also getting on his back....

When he went off they went on a scoring spree. Lol

We go on about our owners and transfers and things but someone really shafted City on this deal. Same with Torres to the chavs. Someone deserves a few pints anyway.

RedAnt » Fri Oct 09, 2015 9:52 am wrote:We go on about our owners and transfers and things but someone really shafted City on this deal. Same with Torres to the chavs. Someone deserves a few pints anyway.

On BlueMoon they are now saying he needs to be dropped because he's a "player for the future". 

£50 million for a future prospect 

"Player for the Future"          

In the future when his pace has gone you'll have nothing but an average player. Expect his career to spiral down to a club in the lower reaches of the prem at best when City get rid of him.

He'd have thrived under Klopp but it's his loss. I doubt he cares sitting on his 200k a week whilst the fans slowly turn on him.

stmichael » Fri Oct 09, 2015 3:50 pm wrote:He'd have thrived under Klopp but it's his loss. I doubt he cares sitting on his 200k a week whilst the fans slowly turn on him.

Sadly I think you're correct.

Quite a few City fans have commented on his lack of technical ability and questioned what he'll done once his pace fades 

7_Kewell » Fri Oct 09, 2015 6:02 pm wrote:

stmichael » Fri Oct 09, 2015 3:50 pm wrote:He'd have thrived under Klopp but it's his loss. I doubt he cares sitting on his 200k a week whilst the fans slowly turn on him.

Sadly I think you're correct.

Quite a few City fans have commented on his lack of technical ability and questioned what he'll done once his pace fades 

Maybe a bit of amphetamine?

Credit where credit is due, he scored a good hat trick..

maguskwt » Mon Oct 19, 2015 11:32 am wrote:Credit where credit is due, he scored a good hat trick..

He did similar performances for us. Next week he'll be back to doing sweet FA.

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/ ... -liverpool

Lol this guy ward was just after his lucrative financial cut and now he comes out with this to save his reputation.