Page 2 of 2

PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 4:57 pm
by A.B.
i take your point completely, leon. but on this occaission the fact that he has a back injury kinda muddles the theory. maybe keegan would've played him if he was fit as we're not the only team looking at him


I personally don't believe that Anelka has a back injury. When Keegan was asked about Anelka's situation he seemed nerveous, he knows that Anelka wants to leave and I think Anelka is saying he's injured so the Man City fans don't make a big comition.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 5:06 pm
by aco67
According to www.teamtalk.com

Fenerbache have also joined the race for Anelka

So maybe it's not done & dusted

PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 5:42 pm
by Gareth G
I think he would choose Liverpool over Fernerbache dude.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:07 pm
by Leonmc0708
andy_g wrote:i don't think we can read too much into anelka not playing - he's injured. and i don't really go along with the theory about a player being left out of the team meaning he may be leaving. morientes played the other night, for example, and it's starting to look pretty done and dusted with him coming now...

That is my point exactly.

Read it again Andy, the fact Anelks will not be cup tied in the FA Cup and will be available for the CL is the point.

By playing in the "6 minute game" Morientes did not get cup tied for the FA cup !  :D

PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:09 pm
by aco67
KOP-1892 wrote:I think he would choose Liverpool over Fernerbache dude.

I'm not saying he wouldn't

I was just quoting facts

PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 12:54 am
by the great one
So we are only looking at Premiership players great ??? I would take certain striker from the championship in place of Peter crouch :D

PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 12:55 am
by the great one
There is good strikers in the lower league but people seem to think if u play in the premiership your good enough to play for your national team.Look at Ricketts when he was at Bolton he played for England and James beattie  :)