Page 8 of 9

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 2:36 am
by 115-1073096938
bigmick wrote:
0asis wrote:Act your age is a moto that could come into immediate effect.

Look Mr Oasis, I don't do internet gangsterism and slanging matches. It doesn't get anybody anywhere. I've done a few posts on here and would be very surprised if you could find more than one or two of mine which have been in any way offensive to anybody.
There is no problem whatsoever with you or anybody else having an opinion which is different to mine and furthermore, saying so. What I did find a tad annoying though if I'm honest, was your dismissal of my opinion and stance as "ridiculous" without any opinion of yours for me to argue against. It wasn't even as if you were of the opinion that Morientes would definately make it (though I'll concede you did make a point about it only being a matter of time before he got used to the rough and tumble of the Prem) it just seemed to me that you were happy to dismiss as ridiculous an opinion that I think he'll never make it in English football.

This "give him time remember Pires/Henri etc etc etc" is an argument that has been done on here a million times. "It's too early to tell" is another. With the greatest respect to you and to anybody else who clings to this IMHO myth, Pires and Henri had already displayed by this stage that they were going to be good players who would adapt. Often what people mean when they say "give him time" is in actual fact give me time so I can be absolutely certain that it ain't gonna happen
before I call it.   

You said in your original post maybe he will make it, maybe he won't (not much chance of being wrong there then) but it's ridiculous to write him off at this stage. Well I've gotta tell you I don't know much but I know this, I am absolutely certain that he won't make it in English football. Ever.
Here's another for you, Cisse won't either. You see here's the really ridiculous thing, we're allowed to say that about Cisse because everybody now knows he ain't worth a carrot. Some of us on here were saying that after about eight games and people said it was ridiculous.

Anyways like I say, lifes too short. I don't think he'll (Morientes) make it and you think that maybe he will, maybe he won't. At the end of the day it's not even a massive disagreement and I have absolutely no interest whatsoever in falling out with anybody about it. You can do your answer to this one and have the very last word.

I've not read the whole thread, the forum's bored me the last few days, i'll be on tomorrow, read it and see whats what, however....

Mick....

Posts like that mate show you up for you are....

Fuckin quality!

Even if you do love Earnshaw... :D

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 4:02 am
by The_Rock
Gracias King Rafa wrote:Just a thought but is Samaras Nando's long lost twin brother? :D

:D .....

1)1970s hairstyle.....
2)Both suck in the premierleague.....


i would say they are related somehow.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 4:54 am
by tel
Anyone on here that still thinks we can get by with our existing strikers is dreaming

At least Crouch put himself about and showed some more aggression, but he is far from the answer to enabling us to compete with top teams

Morientes has had enough chances to show the premiership is too fast and furious for him. We need a proven top draw striker that puts chances away. That was supposed to be Morientes, but he seems to lack hunger.

Robbie will do a great job for us as a back-up striker, but to suggest he's been brought in to solve our goal scoring problems is wrong. He's been brought in to provide another option, not to carry all the responsibility

Fernando Torres in the summer for mine. I watched him single handedly destroy Barcelona 3 weeks ago. We're not going to get away with looking for bargain priced options to do the job. This is an area where money needs to be spent

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:30 am
by stevemm
a question

the banner in the match vs man city which contains "fat Frank"
who's Frank?
Frank Lampard? He's not fat at all

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:33 am
by babu
stevemm wrote:a question

the banner in the match vs man city which contains "fat Frank"
who's Frank?
Frank Lampard? He's not fat at all

:D
cue lando.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:43 am
by stevemm
babu wrote:
stevemm wrote:a question

the banner in the match vs man city which contains "fat Frank"
who's Frank?
Frank Lampard? He's not fat at all

:D
cue lando.

en?
:(
lampard or not?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:45 am
by Alanay
I don't have much complain about the game except we don't score enough even with so many chances.... Overall, we looked very good. Agger is quite a good player but he still need to familiarize with the team and gameplay.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:02 am
by Lando_Griffin
stevemm wrote:a question

the banner in the match vs man city which contains "fat Frank"
who's Frank?
Frank Lampard? He's not fat at all

Thanks Babu.


Fat Frank refers to Fat Frank Lampard, yes.

To insinuate that he is anything but a fat b*stard is enough to get your nose broken in parts of England.

To come out and say "He's not fat at all" is just to perpetuate the breakage of every bone in your body.
Luckily for you, you are an Amoeba, and as such, have no bones to break. Or a brain.

And so is life:
One minute you're up, the next you're right back down again.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:23 am
by stevemm
Lando_Griffin wrote:
stevemm wrote:a question

the banner in the match vs man city which contains "fat Frank"
who's Frank?
Frank Lampard? He's not fat at all

Thanks Babu.


Fat Frank refers to Fat Frank Lampard, yes.

To insinuate that he is anything but a fat b*stard is enough to get your nose broken in parts of England.

To come out and say "He's not fat at all" is just to perpetuate the breakage of every bone in your body.
Luckily for you, you are an Amoeba, and as such, have no bones to break. Or a brain.

And so is life:
One minute you're up, the next you're right back down again.

ok, now i know that fat frank refers to Frank Lampard

but i don't think that ask a question like frank is fat or not matters a lot.
maybe cuz you're a whelk for you care so much about bones

ps yesterday's match was pretty good, and the team. But the banner is little bad

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:33 am
by Lando_Griffin
stevemm wrote:
Lando_Griffin wrote:
stevemm wrote:a question

the banner in the match vs man city which contains "fat Frank"
who's Frank?
Frank Lampard? He's not fat at all

Thanks Babu.


Fat Frank refers to Fat Frank Lampard, yes.

To insinuate that he is anything but a fat b*stard is enough to get your nose broken in parts of England.

To come out and say "He's not fat at all" is just to perpetuate the breakage of every bone in your body.
Luckily for you, you are an Amoeba, and as such, have no bones to break. Or a brain.

And so is life:
One minute you're up, the next you're right back down again.

ok, now i know that fat frank refers to Frank Lampard

but i don't think that ask a question like frank is fat or not matters a lot.
maybe cuz you're a whelk for you care so much about bones

ps yesterday's match was pretty good, and the team. But the banner is little bad

"maybe cuz you're a whelk for you care so much about bones"

Are you drunk, or just thick?  ???

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:33 am
by babu
eehh?

whelk

Any of various large, mostly edible marine snails of the family Buccinidae, having a pointed, spiral shell, especially Buccinum undatum, which is commonly eaten in Europe.

or

An inflamed swelling, such as a pimple or pustule

so i say again. eh?

ps Lando, no i won't be dumping her anytime soon. But if she ever says horseface is cute, then she'll out on the pavement, quick smart.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:35 am
by Lando_Griffin
babu wrote:ps Lando, no i won't be dumping her anytime soon. But if she ever says horseface is cute, then she'll out on the pavement, quick smart.

:laugh:  :laugh:

Good lad!!!!!  :D

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:49 am
by stevemm
Lando_Griffin wrote:
stevemm wrote:
Lando_Griffin wrote:
stevemm wrote:a question

the banner in the match vs man city which contains "fat Frank"
who's Frank?
Frank Lampard? He's not fat at all

Thanks Babu.


Fat Frank refers to Fat Frank Lampard, yes.

To insinuate that he is anything but a fat b*stard is enough to get your nose broken in parts of England.

To come out and say "He's not fat at all" is just to perpetuate the breakage of every bone in your body.
Luckily for you, you are an Amoeba, and as such, have no bones to break. Or a brain.

And so is life:
One minute you're up, the next you're right back down again.

ok, now i know that fat frank refers to Frank Lampard

but i don't think that ask a question like frank is fat or not matters a lot.
maybe cuz you're a whelk for you care so much about bones

ps yesterday's match was pretty good, and the team. But the banner is little bad

"maybe cuz you're a whelk for you care so much about bones"

Are you drunk, or just thick?  ???

nothing
just cuz it hasn't bones which you pay much attention

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:53 am
by babu
this guy sounds a lot like thomas88.  ???

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:56 am
by stevemm
babu wrote:this guy sounds a lot like thomas88.  ???

im really a newbie
so plz don't make me puzzled with saying many things i do not understand