Page 1 of 1

Investment latest - Proposal turned down

PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2004 3:45 pm
by stmichael
Liverpool have rejected an investment proposal from property developer Steve Morgan, according to the magnate.
The Liverpool-born multi-millionaire had hoped to inject cash into the club via a share issue.

A spokesman for Morgan said: "He has made a formal proposal which would result in a very significant injection of new capital into the club.

"That's been turned down. He now awaits the outcome of the board's strategic and financing review with interest."

It was initially thought that Morgan was mounting a takeover bid.

But on Monday he denied that and the club confirmed "that it is not in receipt of a takeover approach from any potential buyer."

With a 5% stake in Liverpool, Morgan is Liverpool's third biggest shareholder behind chairman David Moores (51% majority stake) and Granada (10%).

A share issue would have allowed Morgan to increase his stake in the club massively, maybe to as much as 15%.

The businessman is known to have wanted a seat on the board for some time and had hoped his investment (estimated to be £40-£50m) would be used to part-finance the new Stanley Park stadium and transfers.

Morgan was hugely critical of the financial package to fund the new stadium and he openly attacked Moores and the board at the January Annual General Meeting.

It was at that meeting that Moores finally agreed to discuss a partnership with Morgan.

Morgan made his fortune in the building trade and collected an estimated £240m from selling his stake in building firm Redrow Homes.

:(

PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2004 4:00 pm
by The_Rock
I read that  Moores really does not like this Morgan dude.... Not sure if the rejection was for personal reasons.

50 million could win us the league......... :p

PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2004 4:15 pm
by Woollyback
Not sure if £50m would buy us the league, having said that another strong voice on the board wouldn't go amiss. Moores needs to wise up and forget about loyalty to the manager for a second and think about what's best for the club, maybe Morgan on the board would force him to accept that.

PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2004 4:18 pm
by BOODIDDY
Morgan would be ruthless and that is what this club needs now just like scum, chelsea,madrid and milan. They get rid when players or managers dont get the success their clubs need

PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2004 4:18 pm
by stmichael
definitely agree with that. a strong voice on the board may finally get rid of kermit once and for all. this whole notion of us "not being a sacking club" is b#ll#cks. clubs in italy or spain woul have sacked houllier two years ago. they don't stand for such gross incompetence.